Anti‐PF4/heparin antibody formation postorthopedic surgery thromboprophylaxis: the role of non‐drug risk factors and evidence for a stoichiometry‐based model of immunization |
| |
| Authors: | T E WARKENTIN R J COOK V J MARDER A GREINACHER |
| |
| Institution: | 1. Department of Pathology and Molecular Medicine, and Department of Medicine, Michael G. DeGroote School of Medicine, McMaster University, Hamilton;2. Department of Statistics and Actuarial Science, University of Waterloo, Waterloo, ON, Canada;3. Department of Medicine, David Geffen School of Medicine at University of California‐Los Angeles, Los Angeles, CA, USA;4. Institute for Immunology and Transfusion Medicine, Ernst‐Moritz‐Arndt University Greifswald, Greifswald, Germany |
| |
| Abstract: | Summary. Background: Heparin‐induced thrombocytopenia is an antibody‐mediated disorder exhibiting variable frequency in different clinical settings. Antibodies recognize PF4/heparin complexes formed at optimal stoichiometric molar ratios. Objective: To identify clinical factors influencing risk of anti‐PF4/heparin immunization. Patients/methods: We performed observational studies and exploratory analyses of the frequency of anti‐PF4/heparin antibody formation in 6324 patients who received enoxaparin or fondaparinux in four randomized controlled trials of postorthopedic surgery thromboprophylaxis. Variables included surgery type (knee vs. hip), timing of first anticoagulant dose (pre‐ vs. postsurgery), circumstances of surgery (elective vs. hip fracture), anticoagulant (enoxaparin vs. fondaparinux) and body‐mass index (BMI). We applied a stoichiometry‐based model that predicts immunization risk based on expected differences in PF4/anticoagulant ratios in different settings, and specifically used this model to predict the effect of increasing BMI quartiles upon relative risk (RR) of immunization for fondaparinux vs. enoxaparin. Results: Anti‐PF4/heparin immunization was more frequent after knee vs. hip surgery (particularly for enoxaparin), and when enoxaparin was given post‐ rather than pre‐elective surgery; however, the opposite occurred with hip fracture surgery, that is, antibody formation was more frequent when enoxaparin or fondaparinux was given presurgery. The RR of immunization for fondaparinux vs. enoxaparin decreased significantly for increasing BMI quartiles, an effect predominantly because of increasing immunization with enoxaparin at increasing BMI quartiles. Conclusions: Several non‐drug factors – including type and circumstances of surgery, timing of first anticoagulant dose and BMI – influence risk of anti‐PF4/heparin antibody formation, consistent with a stoichiometry‐based immunization model of PF4 and anticoagulant ratios occurring during the early peri‐operative period. |
| |
| Keywords: | enoxaparin fondaparinux heparin‐induced thrombocytopenia immune response PF4/heparin complexes randomized controlled trial |
|
|
