首页 | 本学科首页   官方微博 | 高级检索  
检索        

辅助生殖技术单胎妊娠女性围产结局分析
引用本文:魏丽坤,宋学茹,赵明飞,王崇丹,徐铮,丁洁,薛凤霞.辅助生殖技术单胎妊娠女性围产结局分析[J].天津医科大学学报,2020,0(6):530-532,537.
作者姓名:魏丽坤  宋学茹  赵明飞  王崇丹  徐铮  丁洁  薛凤霞
作者单位:1.天津医科大学总医院妇产科,天津300052;2.天津市滨海新区塘沽妇产医院妇产科,天津 300451;3.天津市红桥 医院妇产科,天津 300131;4.天津市北辰区中医医院妇产科,天津300400
摘    要:目的:分析辅助生殖技术(ART)单胎妊娠女性围产期母婴结局与自然妊娠女性的差异。方法:回顾性分析了 234例ART单胎妊娠女性(ART组)和20 906名自然妊娠单胎女性(自然妊娠组)围产期妊娠结局,分别比较两组间母婴 围产期并发症差异,包括妊娠期高血压疾病、妊娠期糖尿病(GDM)、前置胎盘、早产、产后出血、分娩方式等,新生 儿结局如新生儿平均出生体重、新生儿窒息、低出生体重儿及巨大儿的发生率、新生儿转入新生儿重症监护病房 (NICU)的发生率及新生儿出生性别比。结果:ART组较自然妊娠组GDM(χ2=67.978,P=0.000)、前置胎盘(χ2 =27.565,P=0.000)、早产(χ2=11.874,P=0.001)、剖宫产分娩(χ2=92.042,P=0.000)的发生风险均显著增 加。ART组较自然妊娠组低出生体重儿(χ2=13.534,P=0.000)、巨大儿(χ2=8.328,P=0.004)、新生儿转入 NICU(χ2=5.763,P=0.016)的发生风险均显著增加。结论:与自然妊娠女性相比,ART单胎妊娠女性母婴不良围产 结局显著增加。

关 键 词:辅助生殖技术  围产结局  妊娠期糖尿病  前置胎盘  早产

Analysis of perinatal outcomes in assisted reproductive technology singletons
WEI Li-kun,SONG Xue-ru,ZHAO Ming-fei,WANG Chong-dan,XU Zheng,DING Jie,XUE Feng-xia.Analysis of perinatal outcomes in assisted reproductive technology singletons[J].Journal of Tianjin Medical University,2020,0(6):530-532,537.
Authors:WEI Li-kun  SONG Xue-ru  ZHAO Ming-fei  WANG Chong-dan  XU Zheng  DING Jie  XUE Feng-xia
Institution:1.Department of Gynecology and Obstetrics, General Hospital,Tianjin Medical University,Tianjin 300052,China;2. Department of Gynecology and Obstetrics, Tanggu Maternity Hospital,Tianjin Binhai New District, Tianjin 300451, China;3. Department of Gynecology and Obstetrics, Tianjin Red Bridge Hospital, Tianjin 300131, China;4. Department of Gynecology and Obstetrics, Tianjin Beichen Chinese Medicine Hospital, Tianjin 300400, China
Abstract:Objective: To analyze the perinatal outcomes of assisted reproductive technology(ART) singleton pregnancies in comparison to spontaneously conceived singletons. Methods: Perinatal outcomes of 234 ART singletons(ART group) and 20 906 spontaneous pregnancies (spontaneous pregnancy group) were analyzed retrospectively. Perinatal complications such as hypertensive disorders complicating pregnancy(HDCP),gestational diabetes mellitus(GDM),placenta previa,premature delivery, postpartum hemorrhage,mode of delivery and neonatal outcomes such as neonatal average birth weight, the incidence of the neonatal asphyxia,low birth weight infants,macrosomia, and neonatal transfer to NICU and neonatal sex ratio were compared between the two groups. Results: ART group had higher GDM(χ 2=67.978, P=0.000),placenta previa(χ2=27.565, P=0.000), premature delivery(χ2=11.874, P=0.001 ) and cesarean delivery rate(χ2=92.042, P=0.000) than spontaneous pregnancy group. ART group had higher low birth weight infants(χ2=13.534, P=0.000),macrosomia(χ2=8.328, P=0.004) and neonatal transfer to NICU rate(χ2=5.763, P=0.016) than spontaneous pregnancy group. Conclusion: Compared with spontaneous pregnancy group, ART singleton pregnancies increased the risks of adverse perinatal outcomes.
Keywords:assisted reproductive technology  perinatal outcomes  gestational diabetes mellitus  placenta previa  premature delivery
点击此处可从《天津医科大学学报》浏览原始摘要信息
点击此处可从《天津医科大学学报》下载免费的PDF全文
设为首页 | 免责声明 | 关于勤云 | 加入收藏

Copyright©北京勤云科技发展有限公司  京ICP备09084417号