北京市不同来源居民死亡数据库的一致性与及时性分析

目的 通过对不同来源北京市死亡居民数据的描述和分析，了解不同来源数据的特点并探索进一步提高数据质量的方式。方法 收集、整理和对比公安、民政及卫生来源北京市户籍居民死亡数据，进行描述性分析，分析不同来源数据的特点及其一致性和及时性。结果 2013-2014年度公安、民政和卫生来源数据共387 003例，其中公安来源户籍居民数据95 318例，民政来源所有数据130 906例，卫生来源户籍居民数据160 779例。卫生和公安来源数据填报完整性及数据字段规范性较高。公安来源数据身份证号码填报率最高，民政来源数据报告及时性最高，卫生来源数据信息量最大。3种来源数据总体一致性及报告及时性较好，但死亡原因等字段一致性有待进一步提高。结论 北京市公安、民政及卫生来源交换数据总体质量较高，但是仍然存在问题需要进一步改进。

Analysis on the consistency and timeliness of death data gathered from different sources in the residents of Beijing

Objective To further improve the quality of mortality data for Beijing residents, through describing and analyzing the current death data gathered from different sources in Beijing. Methods Data on death of the Beijing residents from Beijing Public Security Bureau, Beijing Civil Affairs Bureau and Beijing Centers for Disease Control and Prevention (BJCDC) were collated and compared. Timeliness of related data from the three different sources were described and analyzed. The overall consistency and reported timeliness of data from the three sources appear good, but the consistency on the causes of death needs to be improved. Result Numbers of deaths from the three different sources were 95 318, 130 906 and 160 779 respectively, with 387 003 in total. Data from the Beijing Public Security Bureau and BJCDC seemed better in terms of integrity and accuracy. Data from the Beijing Public Security Bureau had the highest filling rate of ID card number while data from the Beijing Civil Affairs Bureau had the best timeliness. The most informative source of data was from the BJCDC. Conclusion The overall quality of the exchanged death data from Beijing Public Security Bureau, Beijing Civil Affairs Bureau and BJCDC appeared good but remained some areas for improvement.