首页 | 本学科首页   官方微博 | 高级检索  
     


Comparison of motor effects following subcortical electrical stimulation through electrodes in the globus pallidus internus and cortical transcranial magnetic stimulation
Authors:Andrea?A.?Kühn  author-information"  >  author-information__contact u-icon-before"  >  mailto:andrea.kuehn@charite.de"   title="  andrea.kuehn@charite.de"   itemprop="  email"   data-track="  click"   data-track-action="  Email author"   data-track-label="  "  >Email author,Stephan?A.?Brandt,Andreas?Kupsch,Thomas?Trottenberg,Jan?Brocke,Kerstin?Irlbacher,Gerd?H.?Schneider,Bernd-Ulrich?Meyer
Affiliation:(1) Department of Neurology, Charité, Humboldt University Berlin, Campus Virchow-Klinikum, Augustenburger Platz 1, 13353 Berlin, Germany;(2) Department of Neurosurgery, Charité, Humboldt University Berlin, Campus Virchow Klinikum, Augustenburger Platz 1, 13353 Berlin, Germany
Abstract:Current concepts of transcranial magnetic stimulation (TMS) over the primary motor cortex are still under debate as to whether inhibitory motor effects are exclusively of cortical origin. To further elucidate a potential subcortical influence on motor effects, we combined TMS and unilateral subcortical electrical stimulation (SES) of the corticospinal tract. SES was performed through implanted depth electrodes in eight patients treated with deep brain stimulation (DBS) for severe dystonia. Chronaxie, conduction velocity (CV) of the stimulated fibres and poststimulus time histograms of single motor unit recordings were calculated to provide evidence of an activation of large diameter myelinated fibres by SES. Excitatory and inhibitory motor effects recorded bilaterally from the first dorsal interosseus muscle were measured after SES and focal TMS of the motor cortex. This allowed us to compare motor effects of subcortical (direct) and cortical (mainly indirect) activation of corticospinal neurons. SES activated a fast conducting monosynaptic pathway to the alpha motoneuron. Motor responses elicited by SES had significantly shorter onset latency and shorter duration of the contralateral silent period compared to TMS induced motor effects. Spinal excitability as assessed by H-reflex was significantly reduced during the silent period after SES. No ipsilateral motor effects could be elicited by SES while TMS was followed by an ipsilateral inhibition. The results suggest that SES activated the corticospinal neurons at the level of the internal capsule. Comparison of SES and TMS induced motor effects reveals that the first part of the TMS induced contralateral silent period should be of spinal origin while its later part is due to cortical inhibitory mechanisms. Furthermore, the present results suggest that the ipsilateral inhibition is predominantly mediated via transcallosal pathways.This paper is dedicated to Bernd-Ulrich Meyer, who died in a plane accident
Keywords:Deep brain stimulation  Magnetic stimulation  Electrical stimulation  Silent period  Motor cortex
本文献已被 PubMed SpringerLink 等数据库收录!
设为首页 | 免责声明 | 关于勤云 | 加入收藏

Copyright©北京勤云科技发展有限公司  京ICP备09084417号