Affiliation: | (1) Nuclear Medicine Department, Centre Hospitalier Universitaire Vaudois and University of Lausanne, Rue du Bugnon 46, CH-1011 Lausanne, Switzerland;(2) University Institute for Radiation Physics, Centre Hospitalier Universitaire Vaudois and University of Lausanne, Lausanne, Switzerland;(3) Department of Radiology, Cardiac Imaging, Zurich, Switzerland;(4) Zurich Centre for Integrative Human Physiology (ZIHP), University of Zurich, Zurich, Switzerland |
Abstract: | PurposeQuantification of myocardial blood flow (MBF) with generator-produced 82Rb is an attractive alternative for centres without an on-site cyclotron. Our aim was to validate 82Rb-measured MBF in relation to that measured using 15O-water, as a tracer 100% of which can be extracted from the circulation even at high flow rates, in healthy control subject and patients with mild coronary artery disease (CAD).MethodsMBF was measured at rest and during adenosine-induced hyperaemia with 82Rb and 15O-water PET in 33 participants (22 control subjects, aged 30?±?13 years; 11 CAD patients without transmural infarction, aged 60?±?13 years). A one-tissue compartment 82Rb model with ventricular spillover correction was used. The 82Rb flow-dependent extraction rate was derived from 15O-water measurements in a subset of 11 control subjects. Myocardial flow reserve (MFR) was defined as the hyperaemic/rest MBF. Pearson’s correlation r, Bland-Altman 95% limits of agreement (LoA), and Lin’s concordance correlation ρ c (measuring both precision and accuracy) were used.ResultsOver the entire MBF range (0.66–4.7 ml/min/g), concordance was excellent for MBF (r?=?0.90, [82Rb–15O-water] mean difference?±?SD?=?0.04?±?0.66 ml/min/g, LoA?=??1.26 to 1.33 ml/min/g, ρ c?=?0.88) and MFR (range 1.79–5.81, r?=?0.83, mean difference?=?0.14?±?0.58, LoA?=??0.99 to 1.28, ρ c?=?0.82). Hyperaemic MBF was reduced in CAD patients compared with the subset of 11 control subjects (2.53?±?0.74 vs. 3.62?±?0.68 ml/min/g, p?=?0.002, for 15O-water; 2.53?±?1.01 vs. 3.82?±?1.21 ml/min/g, p?=?0.013, for 82Rb) and this was paralleled by a lower MFR (2.65?±?0.62 vs. 3.79?±?0.98, p?=?0.004, for 15O-water; 2.85?±?0.91 vs. 3.88?±?0.91, p?=?0.012, for 82Rb). Myocardial perfusion was homogeneous in 1,114 of 1,122 segments (99.3%) and there were no differences in MBF among the coronary artery territories (p?>?0.31).ConclusionQuantification of MBF with 82Rb with a newly derived correction for the nonlinear extraction function was validated against MBF measured using 15O-water in control subjects and patients with mild CAD, where it was found to be accurate at high flow rates. 82Rb-derived MBF estimates seem robust for clinical research, advancing a step further towards its implementation in clinical routine. |