| Abstract: | THE OBJECT: to detect the informative value of algorithm of cardiac risk assessment recommended by American Heart Association compared with original standard enlarged protocol. Overall 456 patients underwent vascular operations. First group consisted of 198 patients who were examined according original enlarged protocol; other 258 patients (2nd group) were examined with AHA protocol. At 1st group 41% patients didn't need myocardial revascularization (according coronarography results), preventive coronary bypass surgery was performed at 32% patients. At 2nd group coronarography was performed at 133 (51%) patients according risk factors stratification and stress-examination results. Preventive coronary bypass surgery was performed at 97 patients; 27 patients refused this recommendation. Enlarged protocol increases in 2.6 times the odds of unnecessary invasive procedure. It is concluded that AHA algorithm permits to reduce in 2 times and more the number of invasive diagnostic procedures compared with standard enlarged protocol; AHA algorithm increases the clinical and economic effectiveness. |
