首页 | 本学科首页   官方微博 | 高级检索  
检索        


Postneonatal circumcision: population profile
Authors:G L Larsen  S D Williams
Institution:Department of Pediatrics, University of Utah School of Medicine, Salt Lake City.
Abstract:Because postneonatal circumcision includes the risk of general anesthesia and costs more than elective neonatal circumcision, a retrospective study was performed to describe the population currently undergoing postneonatal circumcision and to identify the factors influencing decisions that lead to this procedure. A chart review and follow-up telephone survey were done to gather information concerning patients admitted for postneonatal circumcision to two Salt Lake City hospitals during a 2-year period. From the 135 patients eligible for analysis, two distinct groups emerged: the "sick" group (n = 52)--those who had neonatal complications, and the "well" group (n = 83)--those with no neonatal complications. The median age at circumcision was 5.5 months for the boys in the sick group and 35 months for the boys in the well group (P less than .001, Student's t test). During the neonatal period, 32% of families in the well group received anticircumcision advice from their primary care physician. The decision in favor of circumcision was made by two thirds of the families of sick infants before their sons were 6 weeks of age. Other surgery was performed concurrent with the circumcision in 44% of patients in the sick group and 24% of patients in the well group (P less than .0001, chi 2). Balanitis, phimosis, or a physician's recommendation were listed as the primary reason for post-neonatal circumcision by 50% of patents in the well group. Phimosis was listed by the surgeon as an indication for postneonatal circumcision in 65% of all patients' charts, although only 13% of parents listed phimosis as an indication for their children's circumcision.(ABSTRACT TRUNCATED AT 250 WORDS)
Keywords:
设为首页 | 免责声明 | 关于勤云 | 加入收藏

Copyright©北京勤云科技发展有限公司  京ICP备09084417号