首页 | 本学科首页   官方微博 | 高级检索  
     

不同方法治疗阴道炎的效果评价
引用本文:狄江丽,张小松,刘朝晖,陈丽君,赵更力. 不同方法治疗阴道炎的效果评价[J]. 中国妇幼卫生杂志, 2013, 0(2): 5-7
作者姓名:狄江丽  张小松  刘朝晖  陈丽君  赵更力
作者单位:[1]中国疾病预防控制中心妇幼保健中心,北京100089 [2]北京大学第一医院妇儿中心,北京100034 [3]北京大学第一医院妇产科,北京100034
摘    要:目的了解不同治疗方法对细菌性阴道炎(BV)和外阴阴道假丝酵母菌病(VVC)的治疗效果。方法采用完全随机的方法,将门诊就诊的BV和VVC患者分别随机分为单纯药物组、药物+臭氧组、药物+3%硼酸组和臭氧组进行治疗。结果随着观察时间的延长,不同治疗组BV和VVC患者症状/体征均逐渐好转;BV患者在第一次及第二次复诊时临床疗效有效率,药物+3%硼酸组分别为79.3%和75.8%,臭氧组分别为74.5%和72.0%,药物+臭氧组71.0%和72.4%,单纯药物组69.8%和71.0%。VVC患者在第一次及第二次复诊时临床疗效有效率,药物+臭氧组分别为85.9%和80.6%,药物+3%硼酸分别为77.8%和66.7%,单纯用药组分别为72.6%和65.9%,臭氧组分别为66.7%和58.1%。并且,不同治疗组对BV和VVC患者治疗后的临床疗效比较差异均无统计学意义。结论臭氧治疗阴道炎与药物治疗的疗效相同,在基层没有条件确诊阴道炎病原体的情况下或对于部分药物不耐受的患者,臭氧可作为一种治疗方法使用。

关 键 词:药物治疗  臭氧治疗  细菌性阴道病  外阴阴道假丝酵母菌病  临床疗效

Effectiveness evaluation of different treatment methods for vaginitis
DI Jiang-li,ZHANG Xiao-song,LIU Zhao-hui,CHEN Li-jun,ZHAO Geng-li. Effectiveness evaluation of different treatment methods for vaginitis[J]. Chinese Journal of Women and Children Health, 2013, 0(2): 5-7
Authors:DI Jiang-li  ZHANG Xiao-song  LIU Zhao-hui  CHEN Li-jun  ZHAO Geng-li
Affiliation:1 .National Center for Women and Children's Health, China CDC, Beijing 10089,P.R. China; 2.Center of Women and Children, The First Affiliated Hospital of PKU, Beijing 100034,P.R.China; 3.Department of Gynaeeology and Obstetrics, The First Affiliated Hospital of PKU, Beijing 100034,P.R.China)
Abstract:[ Objective l To know the treatment effect of different treatment methods tor Bacterlat vaglnosls [tlv)ancl Vulvovaginial candidiasi (VVC). [ Methods ] With completely random approach, 264 patients with VVC and 234 patients with BV were respectively divided into drug treatment group, drug and ozone treatment group, drug and 3% boric acid treatment group, and ozone treatment group. [ Resluts ] With the extension of the observation time, the symptoms and signs of BV and VVC patients were gradually improved.For BV patients, the clinical efficiency of drug and 3% boric acid treatment group at first return visit and second return visit was 78.3% and 75.8%, respectively; In ozone treatment group, it was 74.5% and 72.0%, repectively; In drug and ozone treatment group, it was 71.0% and 72.4%, repectively; In drug treatment group, it was 69.8% and 71.0%, respectively.For V~C patients, the clinical efficiency of drug and ozone treatment group at first return visit and second return visit was 85.9% and 80.6%, respectively; In drug and 3% boric acid treatment group, it was 77.8% and 66.7%, respectively; In drug treatment group, it was 72.6% and 65.9%, respectively; In ozone treatment group, it was 66.7% and 58.1%, respectively.Moreover, for BV and VVC patient, the clinical efficiency among different treatment groups is no statistical difference. [ Conclusions ] The clinical efficiencies of ozone and drug treatment for vaginitis are similar.In the resource limited areas, where there is no equipment or proffesional person to diagnose the pathogens of vaginities, or for the patients who are drug intolerance, ozone can be used as a method of treatment for vaginitis.
Keywords:drug treatment  Ozone treatment  bacterial vaginosis  vulvovaginial candidiasi  elinical efficiency
本文献已被 维普 等数据库收录!
设为首页 | 免责声明 | 关于勤云 | 加入收藏

Copyright©北京勤云科技发展有限公司  京ICP备09084417号