首页 | 本学科首页   官方微博 | 高级检索  
检索        

透刺合并氯米帕明治疗强迫症的临床研究
引用本文:周鸿鹏,郝文,阎加民.透刺合并氯米帕明治疗强迫症的临床研究[J].中医临床研究,2013(22):16-18.
作者姓名:周鸿鹏  郝文  阎加民
作者单位:淄博市中西医结合医院,山东淄博255000
摘    要:目的:研究透刺治疗强迫症的临床疗效。方法:60例强迫症患者分为两组,氯米帕明组(对照组)及透刺治疗加氯米帕明组(治疗组)各30例。采用Yale-Brown强迫症量表、汉密尔顿抑郁量表(HAMD)、简明精神病量表(BPRS)、副反应量表(TESS)临床疗效评定标准,分别评定疗效和副反应。结果:对照组痊愈率为26.7%,显效率为56.6%。治疗组痊愈率为43.3%,显效率为76.7%。治疗组疗效优于对照组。对照组不良反应发生率为73.33%,治疗组不良反应发生率为46.67%。两组不良反应发生率差异有显著性(P<0.05)。结论:透刺加小剂量氯米帕明疗效好于氯米帕明。提示透刺治疗的疗效肯定,副作用小,安全性好。

关 键 词:强迫症  中西医结合疗法  透刺

Clinical study on treating OCD by penetration needling method plus chlorimipramine
Abstract:Objective: To study the clinical therapeutic effect of penetration needling method on treating obsessive compulsive disorder (OCD). Methods: 60 cases were divided into two groups, a chlorimipramine group (control group) and a penetration needling method plus chorimipramine group (treated group), 30 cases in each group. Their therapeutic effect and adverse effects were evaluated with Y-BOCS, HAMD, BPRS and TESS, respectively. Results: The cured rate and the markedly effective rate were 26.7% and 56.6% in control group and 43.3% and 76.7% in treated group, respectively, the treated group being better than the control group. The adverse reactive rate was 73.33% in control group and 46.67% in the treated group with a significant difference between the two group (P〈0.05). Conclusion: The therapeutic effect of penetration needling method plus chlorimipramine is better than chlorimipramine only.
Keywords:OCD  The integrative medicine  Penetration needling method
本文献已被 维普 等数据库收录!
设为首页 | 免责声明 | 关于勤云 | 加入收藏

Copyright©北京勤云科技发展有限公司  京ICP备09084417号