国内健康管理研究文献信息的可视化分析

目的 分析国内健康管理领域研究的合作现状及演进过程,为相关机构及学者开展健康管理研究提供决策依据.方法 基于信息可视化工具CiteSpaceⅡ对收集整理的2180篇期刊文献进行数据挖掘,从文献所属机构及地域分布、高产作者及合作关系、高频关键词及研究热点等角度对健康管理领域的研究展开现状分析.结果 国内健康管理研究相关文献量白2007年突破百篇后,呈逐年增长趋势,近3年趋于平稳,年均446.7篇.共有4 216名作者参与了2 180篇文章的发表,平均每篇1.93名作者.除青海、西藏、贵州、海南外,全国其他地区均有教育或科研机构涉及健康管理研究,发文量以北京、江苏、广东、上海、四川居于前列.出现频数≥5的作者共有46名,其中黄建始、鲍勇、吴建国等学者居于前列.出现频率≥15或中心度＞0的关键词共有44个,“健康体检”“健康教育”“高血压”“糖尿病”为当下研究之热点,而生活行为方式干预及学生健康管理则为今后研究关注的重点所在.结论 健康管理领域的科研合作关系从总体上看仍较为松散,跨领域、跨地区、跨机构的合作较少,有关机构及学者应重视健康管理研究的区域性合作,努力搭建全国性或地区性的健康管理学习与交流平台,从而推动我国健康管理研究的全面深入开展.

Literature information visualization for health management research

Objective To learn research cooperation and evolution process in the field of health management in China so as to provide evidence for decision-making. Methods A total of 2180 literatures were selected to investigate author affiliation, high output author, research cooperation, high frequency keywords, and research hotspot through information visualization tool CiteSpace l]. Results Domestic health management research literature had showed an increasing trend since 2007 and leveled off during recent 3 years （average annual output 446.7）. A total of 4 216 authors contributed to 2 180 publications, resulting in an average number of authors per paper of 1.93. Researchers from all autonomous regions and municipalities in China had their health management research published （top five： Beijing, Jiangsu, Guangdong, Shanghai and Sichuan）, expect for Qinghai, Tibet, Guizhou and Hainan. Forty-six authors had an occurrence frequency of 〉/5. Forty-four keywords showed an occurrence frequency of 〉~15 and centrality degree〉0, including health check-up, health education, hypertension, diabetes, life behavior intervention and student health management. Conclusions Health management research have made a rapid progress in China during recent years. Increasing number of research institutions and teams have involved in health management research. However, scientific research cooperation in the field of health management is relatively loose, and interdisciplinary, cross-reginal and interagency cooperation is insufficient.