听神经瘤术中连续听力监测的初步探讨

目的探讨听神经瘤外科术中连续听力监测的意义。方法采用乙状窦人路，在听性脑干反应（auditory brainstem response，ABR）和耳蜗电图（electrocochleogram，ECochG）监测下完成的听神经瘤切除术10例。对手术过程和术后听力结合术中监测进行分析。结果10例听神经瘤术前听力A级3耳，B级4耳，C级3耳（美国耳鼻咽喉头颈外科学会分级标准）。术前的ABR检查Ⅰ、Ⅲ、Ⅴ波存在者5耳（A级3耳，B级2耳），仅见Ⅰ波者5耳（B级2耳，C级3耳）。麻醉后手术前的监测显示：Ⅰ、Ⅲ、Ⅴ波存在者2耳，仅Ⅰ波存在者6耳，以复合动作电位（compound action potential，CAP）的N1波代替波Ⅰ；无波形者2耳。术后听力保留2耳，肿瘤均〈2cm，术前听力都为A级；连续听力监测显示1耳术中及术毕时Ⅰ、Ⅲ、Ⅴ持续存在，1耳Ⅰ、Ⅲ波存在，Ⅴ波消失；术后听力均为A级。听力未保留8耳，其中6耳术中监测时仅CAP的N1（波Ⅰ）存在，手术过程中夹内听动脉或处理内耳道处肿瘤时，4耳CAP波幅明显下降，甚至下降至0，术毕又恢复至术前的50％～60％或正常；1耳蜗神经与肿瘤一并切除，但CAP始终存在；1耳因牵拉脑干侧的耳蜗神经，CAP波幅降至0，手术结束亦未恢复。2耳为全身麻醉后术前监测中未引出任何波形者，其中1耳术中切除部分肿瘤后，出现CAP波，但波幅低，直至术毕；1耳始终未出现波形。结论联合应用ABR和ECochG术中监测，对提高听力保护率有积极意义，能及时反映术中与保留听力相关的敏感手术步骤，然而外科医师的熟练的解剖和精确的手术技巧是手术成功的最基本因素。

Preliminary study of intraoperative auditory monitoring techniques in acoustic neuroma surgery

OBJECTIVE: To investigate the value of intraoperative auditory monitoring techniques in acoustic neuroma surgery. METHODS: Ten cases with acoustic neuroma were resected with retrosigmoid approach. Continuous hearing monitoring of auditory brainstem responses (ABR) and transtympanic electrocochleography (ECochG) was performed during operation. RESULTS: Before surgery, 3 patients had class A hearing, 4 had class B hearing, and 3 had class C hearing. With ABR monitoring, 5 patients had waves I , III and V, 5 had only waves I preoperationly. After anesthesia,only 2 cases had waves I, III and V, 6 had wave I (Compound action potential, CAP N1 is equivalent to wave I of ABR) and 2 had no waves. The hearing was preserved in 2 cases, which had class A hearing post operation with tumor size <2 cm. With continuous hearing monitoring, the waves of I , III and V could be evoked in one case. In another case, the waves of I, III could be evoked after the tumor resection with the disappearance of wave V. The hearing was not preserved in 8 cases. The 6 out of 8 cases showed up CAP (waves I ) waveform. The CAP amplitudes decreased significantly in 4 cases and even dropped to zero while dissecting the tumor at the lateral end of the internal auditory canal (IAC) or clamping the internal auditory artery (IAA) during operation. After surgery, the CAP amplitudes were recovered to 50%-60% of normal level or normal. In one case, although the cochlear nerve was cut down, the CAP could still be recorded after the tumor resection. However, the CAP amplitudes was dropped to zero while pressurized and pulled cochlea nerve of brainstem lateral and the wave disappeared post-operation in another cases. The waves had not been recorded in two cases after anesthesia. One of them showed low amplitude of CAP wave when the tumor partially removed. The others had no wave all the time. CONCLUSIONS: In combination with ABR monitoring, ECochG proved to be a useful supplementary tool for hearing preservation in acoustic neurinoma surgery. Drilling of the IAC and tumor removal at the lateral end of the IAC were the most critical steps for achieving hearing preservation. The surgeon's experience are the most significant factors influencing the hearing outcome after removal of acoustic neuroma.