首页 | 本学科首页   官方微博 | 高级检索  
     

我国法官心理健康状况调查及元分析
引用本文:马慧1,李秀影2,高红新1,闫五一3,邵中玲4,张传友3,景赟3,宋之杰5. 我国法官心理健康状况调查及元分析[J]. 现代预防医学, 2015, 0(21): 3855-3859
作者姓名:马慧1  李秀影2  高红新1  闫五一3  邵中玲4  张传友3  景赟3  宋之杰5
作者单位:1.燕山大学文法学院,河北 秦皇岛 066004;2.大连93253部队卫生队,辽宁 大连 116000;3.秦皇岛市中级人民法院,河北 秦皇岛 066000;4.秦皇岛市北戴河新区人民法院,河北 秦皇岛 066100;5.燕山大学经济管理学院,河北 秦皇岛 066004
摘    要:摘要:目的 调查我国法官心理健康现状,并通过元分析了解我国法官心理健康全貌。方法 采用症状自评量表(SCL-90)对226名法官进行调查,并与律师和公务员进行对比;搜集国内以SCL-90为调查工具、以法官为对象的研究报道,与本研究结果一起进行元分析。结果 被试法官心理健康状况低于全国常模水平,与公务员差异不显著,在躯体化方面低于律师;不同工作年限法官在躯体化、强迫症状、焦虑和“其他”方面存在显著差异。元分析纳入文献共6篇,涉及被试1064人,元分析结果显示,我国法官整体心理健康各方面与一般人群差异不显著;经同质性和敏感性分析,剔除一篇文献后,法官在躯体化、强迫症状、抑郁、焦虑和精神病性方面的状况明显低于一般人群。结论 我国法官整体心理健康状况不佳;由于纳入文献较少、异质性明显,应用此结果需谨慎。

关 键 词:关键词:法官  SCL-90  元分析  心理健康

Investigation and meta-analysis on mental health status of Chinese judges
MA Hui,LI Xiu-ying,GAO Hong-xin,YAN Wu-yi,SHAO Zhong-ling,ZHANG Chuan-you,ZHANG Chuan-you,JING Yun,SONG Zhi-jie. Investigation and meta-analysis on mental health status of Chinese judges[J]. Modern Preventive Medicine, 2015, 0(21): 3855-3859
Authors:MA Hui  LI Xiu-ying  GAO Hong-xin  YAN Wu-yi  SHAO Zhong-ling  ZHANG Chuan-you  ZHANG Chuan-you  JING Yun  SONG Zhi-jie
Affiliation:*College of Humanities and Law, Yanshan University, Qinhuangdao, Hebei 066004, China
Abstract:Abstract: Objective To study the overall mental health status of Chinese judges by investigating the mental health levels of Chinese judges and doing meta-analysis. Methods Symptom Checklist (SCL-90) was used to investigate the mental health status of judges in Hebei Province, which was compared with that of lawyers or civil servants from the same area. Software Review Manager Version 5.1 was applied to do meta-analysis of studies on mental health of Chinese judges by using SCL-90, together with the results of this study. Results The judges had significant higher scores on all the nine factors of SCL-90 than the norm (P<0.05), and had significant higher score on somatization than the lawyers (P<0.001). There was no significant difference in all the nine factors compared to the civil servants (all P>0.05). Finally, six studies including 1064 participants were included. There was overall heterogeneity across these six studies (all P<0.05, I2>50%), so random-effects model was used. Meta-analysis found that the overall effect size of Chinese judges showed no significant difference in mental health level compared with the norm (all P<0.05). One paper was excluded because it caused the overall heterogeneity and sensibility. Then meta-analysis of the remaining 5 studies showed the mental health levels of Chinese judges were inferior to Chinese general levels in somatization, obsessive-compulsive, depression, anxiety, and psychoticism (all P≤0.01). Conclusion The overall mental health status of Chinese judges is poor. Considering few included studies and high heterogeneity, the application of these findings should be careful.
Keywords:Keywords: Judge  SCL-90  Meta-analysis  Mental health
点击此处可从《现代预防医学》浏览原始摘要信息
点击此处可从《现代预防医学》下载免费的PDF全文
设为首页 | 免责声明 | 关于勤云 | 加入收藏

Copyright©北京勤云科技发展有限公司  京ICP备09084417号