2014年上海市奉贤区公共场所卫生监测结果分析

摘要:目的　充分掌握本区公共场所的卫生状况，促进经营单位加强管理，提高本区公共场所卫生水平，预防控制疾病传播和群体性健康危害事件的发生，保障广大市民身体健康。方法　随机抽取我区11类76家各类公共场所，对其中的空气、水质、公共场所用品（顾客用具和卫生设施）进行监测，采用卡方检验对合格率进行统计学分析。结果　共监测各类公共场所室内环境559项次，合格559项次，合格率100%；监测公共场所（游泳池、浴室、足浴）水质137项次，合格129项次，合格率94.16%，其中浴室水合格率最高，为100%，足浴水合格率最低，为80%，各类水质合格率差异有统计学意义（P＝0.013）；监测公共用品涉及的公共场所320项次，合格305项次，合格率95.31%，其中，餐饮类场所合格率最低，为46.15%，理发美容店合格率最高，为100%，各类场所合格率差异有统计学意义（P＝0.001）；不同种类公共场所公共用品158件，合格143件，合格率90.51%，其中理发美容工具类合格率最高，为100％，健身房的器械把手最低，为50％，不同种类公共用品监测结果差别有统计学意义（P＜0.001）。结论　奉贤区公共场所卫生状况总体水平较好，但个别类型场所和种类的公共用品卫生状况不容乐观，应进一步加强卫生监督监测，不断提高公共用品的卫生安全性。

Analysis of sanitation surveillance in public places of Fengxian,Shanghai, 2014

Abstract: Objective To understand the sanitary condition in public places of Fengxian of Shanghai City, and to promote business units to strengthen management. To improve the level of public health, to prevent and control the spread of disease and mass health hazard events, and to safeguard citizens health. Methods In 2014, a total of 76 public places of 11 categories were randomly selected for air, water quality, and public appliances. Chi-square test was used for statistical analysis. Results 559 samples of all kinds of indoor environment in public places were monitored. 559 were qualified, with total qualified rate of 100%. 137 samples of water quality were monitored, with total qualified rate of 94.16%. The qualified rate of bathroom water (100%) was the highest, while that of foot bath water (80%) was the lowest. There was a significant difference between all kinds of water quality (P=0.013). A total of 320 public places samples involving public appliances were monitored, with total qualified rate of 95.31%. There was a significant difference between all kinds of public places (P=0.001). The qualified rate of catering places (46.15%) was the lowest, while that of barber shop (100%) was the highest. A total of 158 different kinds of public appliances of public places were monitored, with total qualified rate of 90.51%. The quailed rate of barber shop (100%) was the highest lowest, while that of the gym equipment (50%) was the lowest. There was a significant difference between different kinds of public appliances of public places (P<0.001). Conclusion The general sanitary level in public places was good, but the sanitary conditions of some kinds of places and appliances are not optimistic. Health surveillance and supervision should be enhanced to improve the safety of the public appliances.