Drug-induced vasodilation: In vitro and in vivo study on the effects of lidocaine and papaverine on rabbit carotid artery

Flap ischemia is often encountered during pedicled and free tissue transfer. In this study, the vascular effects of varying doses of lidocaine, papaverine, and a combination of the two agents were evaluated and compared in an in vitro and in vivo model in the rabbit carotid artery. In the in vitro study, 14 rings from the rabbit carotid artery were bathed in Krebs-Ringers solution and stretched progressively to an optimal tension of 3.7–4.2 grams. Their isometric contractile activity was measured. The specimens were precontracted with norepinephrine (1 μM), and a dose response curve was established by adding cumulatively either lidocaine (to 7 arterial rings) or papaverine (to 7 arterial rings) at increasing concentrations. In the in vivo study, microvascular anastomoses were performed bilaterally in the rabbit carotid artery in 30 animals using 9–0 nylon suture and standard microsurgical techniques. In each animal, one side was treated with heparinized sodium chloride and served as the control. The other side was treated blindly, during and after the anastomoses, with a topical application of 1 ml of either lidocaine 2% (n = 5), lidocaine 20% (n = 5), papaverine (30 mg/ml, n = 5), lidocaine 2% combined with papaverine (30 mg/ml, n = 5), or lidocaine 20% combined with papaverine (30 mg/ml, n = 5). For 30–60 minutes after the procedure, blood flow changes in the vessels were continuously monitored with a transonic doppler applied to both carotid arteries. The 20% lidocaine group was flushed with saline at the end of the first hour and monitored for an additional 60 minutes. Papaverine elicited a concentration-dependent relaxation of norepinephrine precontracted carotid artery rings in vitro. Lidocaine elicited a biphasic response, with low concentrations (10⁻⁶–10⁻⁴ M) increasing the norepinephrine-induced contraction and high concentrations (10⁻⁴–10⁻² M) relieving this contraction. Microsurgical anastomosis produced a significant decrease of blood flow through the rabbit carotid artery as measured by the transonic doppler. Drug application did not alter the systemic blood pressure of the animals. Topical application of lidocaine 2% did not significantly change the blood flow after microvascular anastomosis. Topical application of lidocaine 20%, papaverine (30 mg/ml), or lidocaine (2% or 20%) combined with papaverine significantly increased the blood flow in the rabbit carotid artery. In the lidocaine 20% group, the blood flow remained significantly increased after the drug was flushed with heparinized saline solution. These results demonstrate that topical lidocaine 20%, papaverine, and lidocaine 2% or 20% combined with papaverine significantly increase blood flow in the rabbit carotid artery after microvascular anastomosis. The data confirm the use of papaverine and lidocaine 20%, alone or in combination, as spasmolytics during clinical microsurgery. This suggests that lidocaine 2% alone is not the ideal drug to relieve vascular constriction, and further studies on the clinical use of low concentrations of topical lidocaine in microsurgery is warranted. © 1998 Wiley-Liss, Inc. MICROSURGERY 18:90-96 1998