完全腔镜、腔镜辅助以及常规开放甲状腺切除术的对比研究:前瞻性、非随机、对照研究

目的比较完全腔镜、腔镜辅助以及常规开放甲状腺切除术之间的差别,探讨腔镜下甲状腺手术的可行性和实用性。方法对2007年1月～2008年7月在我院因"甲状腺单发结节"接受手术治疗的196例病人,按照病人的意愿非随机地分为完全腔镜组(74例)、腔镜辅助组(58例)、常规开放组(64例),对3组手术时间、术中出血量、严重并发症、术后疼痛、住院时间、住院费用、术后近期疗效进行比较。结果(1)术中情况:所有患者均接受甲状腺腺叶次全切除或部分切除,完全腔镜组1例中转开放。完全腔镜组的手术时间长于另外两组(F=17.001,P=0.000),完全腔镜组、腔镜辅助组的术中出血量少于常规开放组(Z=11.046,P=0.000)。(2)术后情况:腔镜辅助组的术后疼痛程度轻于常规开放组(χ2=7.891,P=0.019),完全腔镜组的住院时间长于另外2组(F=42.732,P=0.000),完全腔镜组和腔镜辅助组的住院费用明显高于常规开放组(F=468.403,P=0.000)。(3)术后近期疗效:术后3个月完全腔镜组吞咽时不适感以及美容效果均明显优于腔镜辅助组,而腔镜辅助组又优于常规开放组。术后6个月B超均无复发。结论完全腔镜、腔镜辅助下甲状腺切除术安全可行,但住院费用明显增加。与开放手术相比,腔镜手术的美容效果明显,完全腔镜手术的创伤性似乎并不大于开放手术,腔镜辅助手术的创伤小于开放手术。

Comparison among Total Endoscopic,Endoscopic-assisted,and Conventional Open Thyroidectomy:Prospective,Non-Randomized Controlled Trail

Objective To compare the differences among total endoscopic,endoscopic-assisted,and conventional open thyroidectomy,as well as explore the feasibility and efficacy of endoscopic surgery.Methods From January 2007 to August 2008,totally 196 patients with single thyroid nodule underwent thyroidectomy in our hospital.According to the patients' choice,we divided them into three groups:total endoscopy(74 cases),endoscopic-assisted(58 cases),and conventional open(64 cases)groups.The perioperative data including op...