Methodologic Issues in Health Informatics Trials: The Complexities of Complex Interventions |
| |
| Authors: | Ivan Shcherbatykh Anne Holbrook Lehana Thabane Lisa Dolovich COMPETE III investigators |
| |
| Institution: | aCentre for Evaluation of Medicines, St Joseph''s Healthcare Hamilton Hamilton, ON, Canada;bDepartment of Clinical Epidemiology and Biostatistics, McMaster University, Hamilton, ON, Canada;cDivision of Clinical Pharmacology and Therapeutics, Department of Medicine, McMaster University, Hamilton, ON, Canada;dDepartment of Family Medicine, McMaster University, Hamilton, ON, Canada |
| |
| Abstract: | ObjectiveAll electronic health (e-health) interventions require validation as health information technologies, ideally in randomized controlled trial settings. However, as with other types of complex interventions involving various active components and multiple targets, health informatics trials often experience problems of design, methodology, or analysis that can influence the results and acceptance of the research. Our objective was to review selected key methodologic issues in conducting and reporting randomized controlled trials in health informatics, provide examples from a recent study, and present practical recommendations.DesignFor illustration, we use the COMPETE III study, a large randomized controlled clinical trial investigating the impact of a shared decision-support system on the quality of vascular disease management in Ontario, Canada.ResultsWe describe a set of methodologic, logistic, and statistical issues that should be considered when planning and implementing trials of complex e-health interventions, and provide practical recommendations for health informatics trialists.ConclusionsOur recommendations emphasize validity and pragmatic considerations and would be useful for health informaticians conducting or evaluating e-health studies. |
| |
| Keywords: | |
|
|
