首页 | 本学科首页   官方微博 | 高级检索  
检索        

传统骨瓣开颅血肿清除术与小骨窗入路血肿清除术治疗基底节区高血压脑出血的临床疗效对比观察
引用本文:刘万荣,魏忠,方有利,王辉,郭中国,焦健,彭燕,吕东.传统骨瓣开颅血肿清除术与小骨窗入路血肿清除术治疗基底节区高血压脑出血的临床疗效对比观察[J].安徽医药,2017,21(10):1844-1846.
作者姓名:刘万荣  魏忠  方有利  王辉  郭中国  焦健  彭燕  吕东
作者单位:霍邱县第一人民医院神经外科,安徽霍邱,237400;霍邱县第一人民医院神经外科,安徽霍邱,237400;霍邱县第一人民医院神经外科,安徽霍邱,237400;霍邱县第一人民医院神经外科,安徽霍邱,237400;霍邱县第一人民医院神经外科,安徽霍邱,237400;霍邱县第一人民医院神经外科,安徽霍邱,237400;霍邱县第一人民医院神经外科,安徽霍邱,237400;霍邱县第一人民医院神经外科,安徽霍邱,237400
摘    要:目的 对比传统骨瓣开颅血肿清除术与小骨窗入路血肿清除术治疗基底节区高血压脑出血的临床疗效.方法 60例高血压脑出血患者为研究对象,采用随机数字表法分配为观察组和对照组,每组各30例,对照组患者接受传统骨瓣开颅血肿清除术,观察组采用小骨窗入路血肿清除术.比较两组治疗效果(显效、有效和无效)、手术并发症(再出血、颅内感染和肺部感染)和日常生活能力量表(ADL) Barthel评分(术前、术后4周和术后12周).结果 观察组总有效率为93.3%,对照组总有效率为80.0%,观察组疗效优于对照组(P=o.084).并发症方面,观察组的首次手术后再出血率明显低于对照组(6.7% vs30.0%);颅内感染率(3.3%vs20.0%)、肺部感染并发症发生率(16.7%vs40.0%)均低于对照组(均P<0.05).此外,观察组术后4周和术后12周的Barthel评分与对照组也存在明显差异(P<0.05).结论 较之传统骨瓣开颅血肿清除术,小骨窗入路治疗高血压脑出血疗效更为显著,并发症发生率更低,值得临床推广应用.

关 键 词:高血压性脑出血  手术入路  日常生活能力量表评分  临床疗效
收稿时间:2017/1/11 0:00:00
修稿时间:2017/3/8 0:00:00

Clinical effect of small bone window craniotomy evacuation of intracranial hematoma in treating hypertensive cerebral hemorrhage
LIU Wanrong,WEI Zhong,FANG Youli,WANG Hui,GUO Zhongguo,JIAO Jian,PENG Yan and LYU Dong.Clinical effect of small bone window craniotomy evacuation of intracranial hematoma in treating hypertensive cerebral hemorrhage[J].Anhui Medical and Pharmaceutical Journal,2017,21(10):1844-1846.
Authors:LIU Wanrong  WEI Zhong  FANG Youli  WANG Hui  GUO Zhongguo  JIAO Jian  PENG Yan and LYU Dong
Abstract:Objective To evaluate the clinical effect of small bone window craniotomy evacuation of intracranial hematoma in treating hypertensive cerebra9 hemorrhage.Methods Sixty patients with hypertensive cerebral hemorrhage were selected.They were randomly divided into the control group (30 cases) and observation group (30 cases).The control group was treated with conventional craniotomy evacuation of hematoma,while the observation group was treated with small bone window craniotomy evacuation of intracranial hematoma.Treatment efficacy (significantly effective,effective and ineffective),complication (rehamemorrhagia,intracranial infection and pulmonary infection) and Barthel index were compared between two groups.Comparison results and clinical data of these patients were retrospectively analyzed.Results Significantly effective in observation group (70.0%) was much more than control group (50.0%).Curative effect of observation group was superior to control group and the difference was significant (P < 0.05).Amount of rehaemorrhagia in control group (30.0%) was more than observation group (6.7%),intracranial infection (20.0 % vs 3.3 %) and pulmonary infection (40.0% vs 16.7 %) was same.Differences of the above indexes between two groups were all significant (P < 0.05).Moreover,Barthel index of observation group was much better than control group (P < 0.05).Conclusion Treating hypertensive cerebral hemorrhage with minimally invasive intracranial hematoma is remarkably effective.It should be promoted and practiced extensively.
Keywords:Hypertensive cerebral hemorrhage  Operative route  Barthel index  Clinical efficacy
本文献已被 万方数据 等数据库收录!
点击此处可从《安徽医药》浏览原始摘要信息
点击此处可从《安徽医药》下载免费的PDF全文
设为首页 | 免责声明 | 关于勤云 | 加入收藏

Copyright©北京勤云科技发展有限公司  京ICP备09084417号