Body Size Accounts for Most Differences in Bone Density Between Asian and Caucasian Women |
| |
Authors: | P. D. Ross Y.-F. He A. J. Yates C. Coupland P. Ravn M. McClung D. Thompson R. D. Wasnich for the EPIC Study Group |
| |
Affiliation: | (1) Department of Research, Hawaii Osteoporosis Center, 401 Kamakee Street, Honolulu, Hawaii 96814, US;(2) Merck Research Laboratories, Rahway, New Jersey, US;(3) Nottingham City Hospital and University of Nottingham, Nottingham, England, GB;(4) CCBR, Ballerup, Denmark, DK;(5) Oregon Osteoporosis Center, Portland, Oregon, US |
| |
Abstract: | We compared bone mineral density (BMD) of the whole body (and subregions: arm, leg, and pelvis), hip, spine, lateral spine, wrist, and forearm among Caucasian and Asian women at four geographic centers (Honolulu, HI; Nottingham, UK; Portland, OR; Copenhagen, Denmark). Data were derived from the baseline examination of 1367 Caucasian and 162 Asian women enrolled in the 1609-subject Early Postmenopausal Interventional Cohort (EPIC) study. After adjusting for age, study site, years postmenopause, and years of estrogen use, BMD was approximately 4–6% lower (P < 0.05) among Asian women at most skeletal sites, but there was no significant difference for wrist or forearm BMD. Adding height, lean body mass, fat mass, and/or quadriceps muscle strength to the regression models reduced the racial differences at most skeletal sites; after these additional adjustments, Asian women had significantly lower BMD only for the lateral spine (−4.4%; P < 0.005), arm (−2.20%; P < 0.05) and leg (−1.65%; P < 0.05), whereas the wrist was significantly greater (4.64%; P < 0.005) for Asian women. Further research is needed to determine why racial differences in BMD persist at certain skeletal sites, but not others, after adjusting for body size. Received: 22 January 1996 / Accepted: 3 May 1996 |
| |
Keywords: | : Asian race — Bone density — Anthropometry — Caucasian. |
本文献已被 SpringerLink 等数据库收录! |
|