The value of F-18 fluorodeoxyglucose positron emission tomography/computed tomography in asymptomatic examinees with unexplained elevated blood carcinoembryonic antigen levels |
| |
Authors: | Wenfeng Li Weiwei Yin Rongying Ou Ting Chen Lingling Xiong Dezhi Cheng Deyao Xie Xiangwu Zheng Yunsheng Xu Liang Zhao |
| |
Affiliation: | 1.Laboratory for Advanced Interdisciplinary Research, Institutes of Translational Medicine,The First Affiliated Hospital of Wenzhou Medical University,Wenzhou,China;2.Department of Radiation Oncology,The First Affiliated Hospital of Wenzhou Medical University,Wenzhou,China;3.Division of PET/CT, Department of Radiology,The First Affiliated Hospital of Wenzhou Medical University,Wenzhou,China;4.Department of Gynaecology and Obstetrics,The First Affiliated Hospital of Wenzhou Medical University,Wenzhou,China;5.Department of Dermatovenereology,The First Affiliated Hospital of Wenzhou Medical University,Wenzhou,China;6.Department of Cardiothoracic Surgery,The First Affiliated Hospital of Wenzhou Medical University,Wenzhou,China;7.Institutes of Intelligent and Molecular Imaging,The First Affiliated Hospital of Wenzhou Medical University,Wenzhou,China |
| |
Abstract: | PurposeCancer is still a clinical challenge, with many efforts invested in order to achieve timely detection. Unexplained elevated blood carcinoembryonic antigen levels are occasionally observed in an asymptomatic population and considered as a risk factor of cancers. The purpose of this study was to determine the validity of 18 F-fluorodeoxyglucose-positron emission tomography/computed tomography (F-18 FDG-PET/CT) for detecting cancer in an asymptomatic population with an unexplained elevation in blood carcinoembryonic antigen (CEA) levels.MethodsThis retrospective study included a total of 1920 asymptomatic examinees conducted from August 2011 through September 2013. The participants underwent CEA assay and conventional medical imaging (CEA-conventional), or CEA assay and F-18 FDG-PET/CT (CEA-PET/CT). The validity of conventional medical imaging and CEA-PET/CT scanning for detecting cancer and early-stage cancer in an asymptomatic population with an unexplained elevation in blood CEA levels were evaluated.ResultsSensitivity, specificity, cancer detection rate, missed cancer detection rate, early-stage cancer detection rate, and early-stage cancer ratio using the CEA-PET/CT scanning were 96.6 %, 100 %, 10.4 %, 0.4 %, 3.7 %, and 34.5 %, respectively. In contrast, the corresponding values obtained using the conventional medical imaging were 50.6 % (P?0.0001), 100 % (P?>?0.9999), 50.6 % (P?0.0001), 99.9 % (P?=?0.055), 2.6 % (P?0.0001), 2.5 % (P?=?0.04), 0.7 % (P?=?0.0004), and 14.5 % (P?=?0.002), respectively.ConclusionThe F-18 FDG-PET/CT scanning significantly improved the validity of the cancer detection program in the asymptomatic population with an unexplained elevation in CEA levels. |
| |
Keywords: | |
本文献已被 SpringerLink 等数据库收录! |
|