Evidence-based medicine in the treatment of hepatocellular carcinoma

The incidence of hepatocellular carcinoma is increasing worldwide. Diagnosis at early stage is crucial to allow the application of curative treatments, that are the sole hope to increase their life expectancy. Surgical resection and liver transplantation are considered the first line options for early tumors, although there is no agreement on which is the best treatment approach. Resection achieves excellent results in patients with single tumors, absence of portal hypertension and normal bilirubin, but is limited by the high recurrence rate. Liver transplantation also achieves excellent results in patients with single tumors smaller than 5 cm or even three nodules smaller than 3 cm. However, this procedure is hampered by the shortage of donors and the increasing waiting times that have reduced their intention-to-treat outcomes. Treatment while waiting for a donor is controversial, but radical antitumoral therapies seem cost-effective in long waiting times. Percutaneous therapies are reserved for patients with single non-surgical tumors. More than 60 randomized clinical trials have been published to assess treatments for patients with advanced tumors, but there is no definitive evidence of survival benefits. A recent randomized trial reported that chemoembolization may benefit HCC patients in terms of survival, but additional studies to confirm this data are recommended.