首页 | 本学科首页   官方微博 | 高级检索  
检索        


The Impella Microaxial Flow Catheter Is Safe and Effective for Treatment of Myocarditis Complicated by Cardiogenic Shock: An Analysis From the Global cVAD Registry
Authors:Shiva K Annamalai  Michele L Esposito  Lena Jorde  Theodore Schreiber  Shelley A Hall  William W O&#x;Neill  Navin K Kapur
Institution:1. Molecular Cardiology Research Institute;2. Acute Mechanical Circulatory Support Working Group;3. Cardiovascular Center, Tufts Medical Center and Tufts University School of Medicine, Boston, Massachusetts;4. Division of Cardiology, Detroit Medical Center/Wayne State University, Detroit, Michigan;5. Division of Cardiology, Department of Internal Medicine, Baylor University Medical Center, Dallas, Texas;;6. Division of Cardiology, Henry Ford Hospital/Wayne State University, Detroit, Michigan
Abstract:

Background

Myocarditis complicated by cardiogenic shock remains a complex problem. The use of acute mechanical circulatory support devices for cardiogenic shock is growing. We explored the utility of Impella transvalvular microaxial flow catheters in the setting of myocarditis with cardiogenic shock.

Methods and Results

We retrospectively analyzed data from 21 sites within the cVAD registry, an ongoing multicenter voluntary registry at sites in North America and Europe that have used Impella in patients with myocarditis. Myocarditis was defined by endomyocardial biopsy (n?=?11) or by clinical history without angiographic evidence of coronary disease (n?=?23). A total of 34 patients received an Impella 2.5, CP, 5.0, or RP device for cardiogenic shock complicating myocarditis. Baseline characteristics included age 42 ± 17 years, left ventricular ejection fraction (LVEF) 18% ± 10%, cardiac index 1.82 ± 0.46 L·min?1·m?2, pulmonary capillary wedge pressure 25 ± 7 mm Hg, and lactate 27 ± 31 mg/dL. Before Impella placement, 32% (n?=?11) of patients required intra-aortic balloon pump. Mean duration of Impella support was 91 ± 74 hours; 21 of 34 patients (62%) survived the index hospitalization and were discharged with an improved mean LVEF of 37.32% ± 20.31% (P?=?.001); 15 patients recovered with successful support, 5 patients were transferred to another hospital on initial Impella support, 1 patient underwent orthotopic heart transplantation. Ten patients required transition to another mechanical circulatory support device.

Conclusions

This is the largest analysis of Impella-supported myocarditis cases to date. The use of Impella appears to be safe and effective in the settings of myocarditis complicated by cardiogenic shock.
Keywords:Hemodynamics  heart failure  interventional cardiology  mechanical circulatory support
本文献已被 ScienceDirect 等数据库收录!
设为首页 | 免责声明 | 关于勤云 | 加入收藏

Copyright©北京勤云科技发展有限公司  京ICP备09084417号