中西医结合治疗卒中后抑郁的临床探究 |
| |
引用本文: | 甘丽. 中西医结合治疗卒中后抑郁的临床探究[J]. 实用中西医结合临床, 2016, 16(4) |
| |
作者姓名: | 甘丽 |
| |
作者单位: | 汕尾逸挥基金医院综合内科 广东 516600 |
| |
摘 要: | 目的:探讨中西医结合方法治疗卒中后抑郁的临床疗效。方法:将86例卒中后抑郁患者随机分为研究组和对照组,每组43例。对照组给予西药帕罗西汀治疗,研究组给予西药帕罗西汀联合中药自拟活血通络方治疗。结果:治疗前两组患者的HAMD量表(汉密顿抑郁量表)评分比较无明显差异(P>0.05),治疗后1个月、2个月研究组的HAMD量表评分,明显低于对照组(P<0.05);观察组不良反应发生率为8.8%,对照组不良反应发生率为6.6%,两组无显著性差异(P>0.05)。结论:中西医结合方法治疗卒中后抑郁的临床疗效明显优于单纯西医治疗,安全性高,值得临床推广应用。
|
关 键 词: | 卒中 抑郁 中西医结合 临床疗效 不良反应 |
收稿时间: | 2016-03-03 |
修稿时间: | 2016-03-18 |
Clinical Depression after stroke treatment Integrative Medicine |
| |
Abstract: | Objective: To explore the clinical efficacy of traditional Chinese and western medicine treatment of post-stroke depression. Methods: 86 cases of post-stroke depression were randomly divided into the study group and the control group ,43 cases of each group. The control group received medicine paroxetine treatment , the study group received medicine paroxetine combined with traditional Chinese medicine self Huoxuetongluo Recipe treatment. Results: The two groups of patients before treatment HAMD scale (Hamilton Depression Scale) score was not significantly different (P>0.05); after 1 month, 2 months of the study group HAMD scale scores were lower than the control group (P<0.05); the study group occurrence of adverse drug reactions rate was 8.8%, the control group occurrence of adverse drug reactions rate was 6.6%, the two groups was no significant difference (P>0.05). Conclusion: Integrative Medicine clinical efficacy of treatment of stroke depression was significantly better than western medicine, safe, worthy of clinical promotion and application. |
| |
Keywords: | Stroke Depression Integrative Medicine Clinical efficacy Adverse reactions |
|
| 点击此处可从《实用中西医结合临床》浏览原始摘要信息 |
|
点击此处可从《实用中西医结合临床》下载免费的PDF全文 |
|