Improved lung delivery from a passive dry powder inhaler using an Engineered PulmoSphere powder

Purpose. To assess the pulmonary deposition and pharmacokinetics of an engineered PulmoSphere® powder relative to standard micronized drug when delivered from passive dry powder inhalers (DPIs). Methods. Budesonide PulmoSphere (PS_bud) powder was manufactured using an emulsion-based spray-drying process. Eight healthy subjects completed 3 treatments in crossover fashion: 370 g budesonide PulmoSphere inhaled from Eclipse® DPI at target PIF of 25 L·min^-1 (PS_bud25), and 50 L·min^-1 (PS_bud50), and 800 g of pelletized budesonide from Pulmicort® Turbuhaler® at 60 L·min^-1(TH_bud60). PS_bud powder was radiolabeled with ^99mTc and lung deposition determined scintigraphically. Plasma budesonide concentrations were measured for 12 h after inhalation. Results. Pulmonary deposition (mean ± sd) of PS_bud was 57 ± 7% and 58 ± 8% of the nominal dose at 25 and 50 L·min^-1, respectively. Mean peak plasma budesonide levels were 4.7 (PS_bud25), 4.0 (PS_bud50), and 2.2 ng·ml^-1 (TH_bud60). Median t_max was 5 min after both PS_bud inhalations compared to 20 min for Turbuhaler (P < 0.05). Mean AUCs were comparable after all inhalations, 5.1 (PS_bud25), 5.9 (PS_bud50), and 6.0 (TH_bud60) ng·h·ml^-1. The engineered PS_bud powder delivered at both flow rates from the Eclipse® DPI was twice as efficiently deposited as pelletized budesonide delivered at 60 L·min^-1 from the Turbuhaler. Intersubject variability was also dramatically decreased for PS_bud relative to TH_bud. Conclusion. Delivery of an engineered PulmoSphere formulation is more efficient and reproducible than delivery of micronized drug from passive DPIs.