Complete arterial revascularisation in patients older than 70 years.

BACKGROUND: Coronary artery bypass grafting (CABG) using left internal thoracic artery and vein grafts is standard in patients of advanced age. A number of these patients, however, present without suitable vein grafting material and thus require the use of arterial conduits. In order to investigate the safety and efficacy of complete arterial revascularisation, we have compared the perioperative results of patients older than 70 years with conventional CABG and complete arterial revascularisation. PATIENTS AND METHODS: Group I (n = 172) with conventional CABG in 1999 was compared with 152 patients (group II) with complete arterial CABG between 1996 and July 2000. There were no significant differences regarding age, gender, left ventricular ejection fraction or incidence of three-vessel disease or left main stenosis. The proportion of reoperations was significantly higher in group II (16 %) vs. group I (4 %). RESULTS: A mean of 3.7 +/- 0.7 anastomoses (I) versus 4.0 +/- 0.9 (II) were performed per patient (p = n. s.). Mean operating time (I: 210 +/- 46 min; II: 194 +/- 46 min) and bypass time (I: 87 +/- 25 min; II: 78 +/- 29 min) were significantly lower in group II. Ischemic time (I: 46 +/- 22 min; II: 49 +/- 21 min) was not significantly different. The incidence of sternal dehiscence was 2.9 % (I: n = 5) vs. 1.3 % (II: n = 2). Hospital mortality was 4.6 % in group I vs. 3.9 % (II). CONCLUSION: Complete arterial revascularisation is a safe option in patients aged over 70. It remains to be shown whether it may also have advantage in the long term.