| 两种窝沟封闭术疗效比较的系统评价 |
| |
| 引用本文： | 梅丽琴,曲云鹏,徐小萌. 两种窝沟封闭术疗效比较的系统评价[J]. 实用口腔医学杂志, 2011, 27(6): 822-827. DOI: 10.3969/j.issn.1001-3733.2011.06.021 |
| |
| 作者姓名： | 梅丽琴 曲云鹏 徐小萌 |
| |
| 作者单位： | 温州医学院附属口腔医院,325000 |
| |
| 摘 要： | 目的:系统评价釉质成形封闭术(enameloplasty sealant technique,EST)和普通窝沟封闭术(conventional sealant techni-que,CST)的临床疗效。方法:采用Cochrane系统评价的方法,计算机检索我国有关EST与CST的临床随机对照研究的文献,检索时间截止2010年。在严格筛选资料和质量评价的基础上,采用RevMan 5.0软件对纳入的研究进行Meta分析。结果:共检索到38篇相关文献,最终有9篇文献符合纳入标准。Meta分析结果显示,EST组术后1年新龋发生率与CST组差异无统计学意义[OR=0.45,95%CI(0.10,2.05)],其它时期防龋效果及3年封闭剂保存率均优于CST组,差异有统计学意义[OR=2.67,95%CI(1.91,3.73)]。结论:现有证据表明,窝沟釉质成形封闭术的防龋效果优于普通窝沟封闭术。
|
| 关 键 词： | 釉质成形封闭术 普通窝沟封闭术 疗效 系统评价 |
Enameloplasty sealant technique versus conventional sealant technique for caries prevention:A systematic review |
| |
| MEI Liqin,QU Yunpeng,XU Xiaomeng. Enameloplasty sealant technique versus conventional sealant technique for caries prevention:A systematic review[J]. Journal of Practical Stomatology, 2011, 27(6): 822-827. DOI: 10.3969/j.issn.1001-3733.2011.06.021 |
| |
| Authors: | MEI Liqin QU Yunpeng XU Xiaomeng |
| |
| Affiliation: | MEI Liqin,QU Yunpeng,XU Xiaomeng.325000 Wenzhou,The Affiliated Stomatology Hospital,Wenzhou Medical College,China |
| |
| Abstract: | Objective: To access effectiveness of enameloplasty sealant technique(EST) versus conventional sealant technique(CST) for preventing caries.Methods: The Cochrane reviewers' handbook was followed.Domestic published articles before 2011 were selected by computer.All the retrieved studies were clinical control trials related to EST versus CST for preventing caries.The quality of the included studies was critically evaluated and data were analyzed by the RevMan 5.0 software.Results: 38 articles were found,only ... |
| |
| Keywords: | Enameloplasty sealant technique Conventional sealant technique Effectiveness Systematic review |
| 本文献已被 CNKI 万方数据 等数据库收录！ |
|
