首页 | 本学科首页   官方微博 | 高级检索  
检索        

《大众预防艾滋病相关知识态度行为调查问卷》信度、效度分析
引用本文:李雨波,李英华,王新伦,高秋菊,白玥,靳雪征,江虹,陶茂萱.《大众预防艾滋病相关知识态度行为调查问卷》信度、效度分析[J].中国健康教育,2008,24(4):250-253.
作者姓名:李雨波  李英华  王新伦  高秋菊  白玥  靳雪征  江虹  陶茂萱
作者单位:1. 中国疾病预防控制中心健康教育所,北京,100011
2. 中国人民解放军白求恩军医学院,河北,石家庄,050081
基金项目:卫生部艾滋病防治专项基金
摘    要:目的评价通过Delphi法形成的《大众预防艾滋病相关知识态度行为调查问卷》的信度、效度。方法将研制的《大众预防艾滋病相关知识态度行为调查问卷》,应用于人群调查,通过问卷调查结果,分析问卷的信度、效度。结果共选出19个指标,用于评价大众艾滋病相关知识的掌握情况及其对艾滋病感染者的正确态度持有情况。19个指标的相关系数在0.370-0.809之间,其中15个指标的Spearman相关系数均大于0.5,P值均小于0.01。问卷各部分及问卷总体Cronbacha系数、分半信度在0.387-0.620之间。对19个指标进行因子分析,产生7个公共因子,它们总共能够解释总体方差的69.30%。19个指标因子负荷在0.450-0.899之间,均大于0.40的基本要求。结论本问卷信度、效度符合要求,问卷具有较好的稳定性和内在一致性。

关 键 词:艾滋病  调查问卷  信度  效度  评价
文章编号:1002-9982(2008)04-0250-04
修稿时间:2007年11月28

Analysis on reliability and validity of KAP Questionnaire on AIDS prevention for the Public
Li Yu-bo,Li Ying-hua,Wang Xin-lun,Gao Qiu-ju,Bai Yue,Jin Xue-zheng,Jiang Hong,Tao Mao-xuan.Analysis on reliability and validity of KAP Questionnaire on AIDS prevention for the Public[J].Chinese Journal of Health Education,2008,24(4):250-253.
Authors:Li Yu-bo  Li Ying-hua  Wang Xin-lun  Gao Qiu-ju  Bai Yue  Jin Xue-zheng  Jiang Hong  Tao Mao-xuan
Institution:Li Yu-bo , Li Ying- hua , Wang Xin-lun , Gao Qiu-ju , Bai Yue , Jin Xue-zheng , Jiang Hong , Tao Mao-xuan ( National Institute for Health Education, Chinese Center for Disease Control and Prevention, Beijing 100011, China)
Abstract:Objective To evaluate the reliability and validity of KAP Questionnaire on AIDS Prevention for the Public made by Delphi method. Methods By analyzing the results of the questionnaire survey, the reliability and validity were calculated. Results 19 indicators were screened out to evaluate the AIDS knowledge and the right attitude to HIV carrier of the public. The correlation coefficient of 19 indicators were range from 0. 370 to 0. 809, of which 15 indicators were more than 0.5, and their P values were all less than 0.01. Each part and the whole Cronhach a coefficient of the questionnaire, split reliability were all range from 0.387 to 0.620. Seven public factors were produced by factors analyzing of 19 indicators, they could explain 69.30% of the whole variance. The factor loadings of the 19 indicators were 0.450-0.899, which were all over 0.40. Conclusion The reliability and validity of the questionnaire had reached the demands of standard questionnaire.
Keywords:AIDS  Questionnaires Reliability  Validity  Evaluation
本文献已被 维普 万方数据 等数据库收录!
设为首页 | 免责声明 | 关于勤云 | 加入收藏

Copyright©北京勤云科技发展有限公司  京ICP备09084417号