Systematic review of the QoR-15 score,a patient- reported outcome measure measuring quality of recovery after surgery and anaesthesia |
| |
Authors: | J Kleif J Waage KB Christensen I Gögenur |
| |
Institution: | 1. Department of Surgery, North Zealand Hospital, Copenhagen University Hospital, Dyrehavevej 29, 3400 Hillerød, Denmark;2. Section of Biostatistics, Department of Public Health, Faculty of Health and Medical Sciences, University of Copenhagen, Denmark;3. Department of Surgery, Center for Surgical Science, Zealand University Hospital, Køge, Denmark |
| |
Abstract: | BackgroundThe QoR-15 is a patient-reported outcome questionnaire that measures the quality of recovery after surgery and anaesthesia. We aimed to perform a systematic review and meta-analysis of the measurement properties of the QoR-15.MethodsStudies reporting measurement properties or interpretability of the QoR-15 after surgery were eligible for inclusion. All languages were included in the PubMed and Embase search. The COSMIN guidelines for systematic reviews of patient-reported outcome measurements were followed. Criteria for good measurement properties outlined in the consensus-based guidelines for selecting outcome measurement instruments for clinical trials were applied. A metaanalysis and synthesis of data across studies was performed.ResultsNine hundred and thirty-three titles were identified, and six articles were included in the study. The study population comprised 1548 patients undergoing a variety of surgical elective procedures. The QoR-15 was validated in English, Danish, Chinese, and Portuguese. High-quality evidence for good content validity, good internal consistency (Cronbach's α of 0.836), and essential unidimensionality of the QoR-15 as a measurement of postoperative quality of recovery was found. There was at least moderate-quality evidence of good reliability of the QoR-15 (intraclass correlation of 0.989) and good error of measurement (standard error of measurement of 1.85). The upper 95% confidence limit of the smallest detectable change was 3.63, and the minimal clinical important difference was 8.0.ConclusionsThe QoR-15 fulfils requirements for outcome measurement instruments in clinical trials and is the first measurement instrument of postoperative quality of recovery to undergo a systematic review according to the COSMIN checklist. |
| |
Keywords: | anaesthesia recovery period patient reported outcome measures |
本文献已被 ScienceDirect 等数据库收录! |
|