| Abstract: | Inguinal intravenous digital subtraction angiography (DSA) was performed in 14 patients referred for preoperative evaluation of a renal tumor previously diagnosed by CT and ultrasound. Conventional cavography and aortography were used as reference methods for comparison. Both DSA and conventional angiography were carried out following selective arterial injection to the abnormal kidney. The diagnostic value of DSA in examination of the inferior vena cava was generally comparable to that of conventional cavography. Intravenous aortography was unsuccessful in 2 patients due to motion artifacts. In all other patients, the information provided by DSA regarding the aorta, renal arteries and renal veins was similar to that of conventional aortography. Intrarenal vascular detail, however, was far superior on conventional films and was only useful with DSA when intra-arterial injection was implemented. In one of the 12 diagnostic examinations, localization of the renal mass could not be established by intravenous DSA, but was possible in all others. The inguinal approach advocated permits simultaneous inferior vena cavography and intravenous aortography with one single injection of contrast medium; the method is less traumatic than aortography , and does not require hospitalization of the patient. DSA may also be of value in those cases still requiring selective catheterization of the renal arteries, i.e. for angiotherapy . Intra-arterial DSA then allows reduction of the amount of contrast medium and a rapid processing of the images without detriment to the quality of the examination. |
