Traditional Chinese medicine for pressure ulcer: a meta‐analysis |
| |
Authors: | Qin‐Hong Zhang Zhong‐Ren Sun Jin‐Huan Yue Xue Ren Li‐Bo Qiu Xiao‐Lin Lv Wei Du |
| |
Affiliation: | 1. QH Zhang, MD, PhD, College of Basic Medical Sciences of Heilongjiang University of Chinese Medicine, Harbin, Heilongjiang, China;2. ZR Sun, MD, PhD, College of Acupuncture Moxibustion and Massage of Heilongjiang University of Chinese Medicine, Harbin, Heilongjiang, China;3. JH Yue, MD, College of Graduate students, Heilongjiang University of Chinese Medicine, Harbin, Heilongjiang, China;4. X Ren, MD, College of Graduate students, Heilongjiang University of Chinese Medicine, Harbin, Heilongjiang, China;5. LB Qiu, MD, College of Graduate students, Heilongjiang University of Chinese Medicine, Harbin, Heilongjiang, China;6. XL Lv, MD, College of Graduate students, Heilongjiang University of Chinese Medicine, Harbin, Heilongjiang, China;7. W Du, MD, College of Graduate students, Heilongjiang University of Chinese Medicine, Harbin, Heilongjiang, China |
| |
Abstract: | To assess the effect of Traditional Chinese Medicine (TCM) [Chinese herbal medicine ointment (CHMO), acupuncture and moxibustion] on pressure ulcer. In this study, we searched MEDLINE, EMBASE, CENTER, CBM, CNKI, WAN FANG and VIP for articles published from database inception up to 4 April 2011. We included randomised controlled trials (RCTs), which compared the effects of TCM with other interventions. We assessed the methodological quality of these trials using Cochrane risk of bias criteria. Ten of 565 potentially relevant trails that enrolled a total of 893 patients met our inclusion criteria. All the included RCTs only used CHMO intervention, because acupuncture and moxibustion trials failed to meet the inclusive criteria. A meta‐analysis showed beneficial effects of CHMO for pressure ulcer compared with other treatments on the total effective rate [risk ratio (RR): 1·28; 95% confidence interval (CI): 1·20–1·36; P = 0·53; I2 = 0%), curative ratio (RR: 2·02; 95% CI: 1·73–2·35; P = 0·11; I2 = 37%) and inefficiency rate (RR: 0·16; 95% CI: 0·02–0·80; P = 0·84; I2 = 0%). However, the funnel plot indicated that there was publication bias in this study. The evidence that CHMO is effective for pressure ulcer is encouraging, but due to several caveats, not conclusive. Therefore, more rigorous studies seem warranted. |
| |
Keywords: | Acupuncture Bedsores Chinese herbal medicine ointment Moxibustion Pressure ulcer |
|
|