首页 | 本学科首页   官方微博 | 高级检索  
检索        

喉内镜下等离子消融术与开放性手术治疗早期喉癌的疗效对比
引用本文:徐夏,邓文婷,黄成志,陈勇挺,汪建.喉内镜下等离子消融术与开放性手术治疗早期喉癌的疗效对比[J].山东大学耳鼻喉眼学报,2019,33(2):81-85.
作者姓名:徐夏  邓文婷  黄成志  陈勇挺  汪建
作者单位:1.南方医科大学南方医院耳鼻咽喉头颈外科, 广东 广州 510515;2.中国人民解放军南部战区总医院耳鼻咽喉头颈外科, 广东 广州 510010
基金项目:广东省自然科学基金资助项目(02014A030310032)
摘    要:目的探讨经支撑喉镜内镜辅助下等离子消融术治疗早期声门型喉癌的疗效,并与常规开放性手术作对比分析。方法回顾早期声门型喉鳞癌55例患者临床资料,按手术方式分为等离子组35例、喉裂开组20例,分析比较两组手术情况、并发症、复发率,并应用嗓音分析软件比较两组患者术后嗓音恢复情况。结果等离子组及喉裂开组患者在手术时间(15.60±7.20)vs(94.00±9.95)min)]、术中出血(8.94±8.06)vs(100.75±28.34)mL]、住院时间(6.86±0.77)vs(11.45±1.05)d]、术后疼痛视觉模拟评分(2.66±0.91)vs(4.65±1.04)分]及呛咳评分(3.60±0.85)vs(6.05±1.23)分]的差异均有统计学意义(P<0.05);两组术后肉芽增生发生率及复发率差异无统计学意义(P>0.05);术后12个月嗓音分析两组嗓音参数(Jitter、Shimmer、HNR)均较术前好转,等离子组上述参数恢复情况均优于喉裂开组:基频微扰(Jitter)(0.66±0.15)vs(0.78±0.18)%],振幅微扰(Shimmer)(4.57±1.14)vs(5.66±0.97)%],谐噪比(HNR)(17.41±2.58)vs(15.39±1.63)dB],组间差异有统计学意义(P<0.05)。结论经支撑喉镜内镜辅助下等离子消融术治疗早期喉癌疗效确切,较喉裂开术具有微创、高效、术后嗓音恢复好的优势。

关 键 词:早期声门型喉癌  等离子消融术  喉裂开术  嗓音分析

Curative effect analysis of endoscopic laryngeal surgery with plasma radiofrequency ablation versus open surgery to treat early glottic cancer
XU Xia,DENG Wenting,HUANG Chengzhi,CHEN Yongting,WANG Jian.Curative effect analysis of endoscopic laryngeal surgery with plasma radiofrequency ablation versus open surgery to treat early glottic cancer[J].Journal of Otolaryngology and Ophthalmology of Shandong University,2019,33(2):81-85.
Authors:XU Xia  DENG Wenting  HUANG Chengzhi  CHEN Yongting  WANG Jian
Institution:Department of Otolaryngology, General Hospital of Southern Theatre Command of PLA, Guangzhou 510010, Guangdong, China
Abstract:Objective To evaluate the clinical efficacy of endoscopic laryngeal surgery with plasma radiofrequency ablation vs. conventional open surgery to treat early glottic cancer. Methods Resection of laryngeal cancer was performed at our hospital between January 2013 and August 2016 in 55 patients with early glottic squamous cell cancer. Endoscopic laryngeal surgery with plasma radiofrequency ablation was performed in 35 patients(plasma group), and open surgery was performed in 20 patients(laryngofissure group). The situation of surgery, complications, recurrence rate, and postoperative change in voice were compared between the groups. Results The intraoperative blood loss(8.94±8.06 vs. 100.75±28.34 mL), operative time(15.60±7.20 vs. 94.00±9.95 min), length of hospitalization(6.86±0.77 vs. 11.45±1.05 days), postoperative pain scores(2.66±0.91 vs. 4.65±1.04), and the cough visual analogue scale scores(3.60±0.85 vs. 6.05±1.23)in the plasma group were better than those in the laryngofissure group(P<0.05). However, no intergroup difference was observed in the granulation hyperplasia and recurrence rates(P>0.05). Acoustic parameters, including fundamental frequency perturbation(jitter)(0.78±0.18 vs. 0.66±0.15%), amplitude perturbation(shimmer)(5.66±0.97 vs. 4.57±1.14%), and the harmonic noise ratio(17.41±2.58 vs. 15.39±1.63 dB)recorded a year postoperatively showed more significant improvement in the plasma than in the laryngofissure group. Notably, this intergroup difference was statistically significant(P<0.05). Conclusion Endoscopic laryngeal surgery with plasma radiofrequency ablation effectively treats early glottic cancer. This procedure scores over open surgery in terms of being a minimally invasive and highly effective approach associated with better voice preservation.
Keywords:Early glottic cancer  Plasma radiofrequency ablation  Laryngofissure  Voice analysis  
本文献已被 CNKI 维普 等数据库收录!
点击此处可从《山东大学耳鼻喉眼学报》浏览原始摘要信息
点击此处可从《山东大学耳鼻喉眼学报》下载免费的PDF全文
设为首页 | 免责声明 | 关于勤云 | 加入收藏

Copyright©北京勤云科技发展有限公司  京ICP备09084417号