| 泪道挂线与泪道插管治疗阻塞性泪道疾病的对比观察 |
| |
| 引用本文： | 宋君胜,范智勇,江伟.泪道挂线与泪道插管治疗阻塞性泪道疾病的对比观察[J].实用全科医学,2004,2(6):548-548. |
| |
| 作者姓名： | 宋君胜 范智勇 江伟 |
| |
| 作者单位： | 安徽省东至县医院
247200(宋君胜，范智勇)，安徽省东至县医院 247200(江伟) |
| |
| 摘 要： | 目的 探讨泪道阻塞的两种治疗方法。方法 两组病例，一组行泪道挂线术；一组行泪道插管术。结果 泪道挂线组治愈率为61％，有效率为90％；泪道插管组治愈为36％，有效率为70％。结论 泪道挂线术优于泪道插管术。
|
| 关 键 词： | 阻塞性泪道疾病 泪道挂线术 泪道插管术 泪小管割裂 泪囊鼻腔吻合术 |
| 修稿时间： | 2004年3月8日 |
Contrastive study of seton through lacrimal passage and intubation through lacrimal passage for obstructive diseases of lacrimal passage |
| |
| SONG Junsheng,FAN Zhiyong,JIANG Wei. Hospital of Dongzhi County,Anhui.Contrastive study of seton through lacrimal passage and intubation through lacrimal passage for obstructive diseases of lacrimal passage[J].Applied Journal Of General Practice,2004,2(6):548-548. |
| |
| Authors: | SONG Junsheng FAN Zhiyong JIANG Wei Hospital of Dongzhi County Anhui |
| |
| Institution: | SONG Junsheng,FAN Zhiyong,JIANG Wei. Hospital of Dongzhi County,Anhui 247200 |
| |
| Abstract: | Objective To investigate two kinds of treatments (seton through lacrimal passage and intubation through lacrimal passage) for obstruction diseases of lacrimal passage. Methods Patients in first group were treated with seton through lacrimal passage, patients in second group were treated with intubation through lacrimal passage. Results In first group, the cure rate was 61%, the effective rate was 90%. In second group, the cure rate was 36%, the effective rate was 70%. Conclusions The effect of seton through lacrimal passage is better than intubation through lacrimal passage. |
| |
| Keywords: | Obstruction of lacrimal duct Seton through lacrimal passage Intubation through lacrimal passage |
| 本文献已被 CNKI 维普 万方数据 等数据库收录！ |
