首页 | 本学科首页   官方微博 | 高级检索  
检索        


A comparison of cardiac and vascular clorgyline-resistant amine oxidase and monoamine oxidase: Inhibition by amphetamine,mexiletine and other drugs
Authors:David E Clarke  Geoffrey A Lyles  Brian A Callingham
Institution:1. Department of Pharmacology, University of Houston, Houston, TX 77004, U.S.A.;2. Department of Pharmacology, University of Cambridge, Cambridge CB2 2QD, U.K.
Abstract:Clorgyline-resistant amine oxidase (CRAO) and monoamine oxidase (MAO) were studied in homogenates of rat heart and aorta, using benzylamine and tyramine as substrates. In heart, benzylamine at 0.001 mM was deaminated solely by CRAO. With higher concentrations of benzylamine (0.01, 0.1 and 1.OmM), an increasing involvement of MAO-A and MAO-B became apparent in the deamination of benzylamine such that, at 1.0 mM benzylamine, deaminated products resulted equally from MAO-A, MAO-B and CRAO. In aorta, benzylamine was deaminated solely by CRAO irrespective of the concentration used. Tyramine (0.01, 0.1, 1.0 and 5.0 mM) was deaminated entirely by MAO-A in heart, whereas in the aorta both MAO-A and CRAO participated. In aorta the ratio of product formation from MAO-A and CRAO did not vary with changes in the concentration of tyramine, indicating similar Km values for both enzymatic activities. Further studies with tyramine (0.1 mM) and clorgyline showed biphasic inhibition curves suggestive of two distinct MAO-A components in both heart and aorta. The two components showed different properties in the heart when compared with aorta. When homogenates of hearts were heated at 50° for 1 hr, their sensitivity to inhibition by clorgyline increased, while in homogenates of aorta sensitivity to clorgyline decreased. CRAO was investigated further with benzylamine as substrate. Kinetic studies gave similar Km values for both heart and aorta (4–6 μM at pH 7.8), and these values were not altered by flushing the assay tubes with oxygen. However, flushing with nitrogen caused uncompetitive inhibition in the heart and noncompetitive inhibition in aorta. These results suggest a difference in the catalytic mechanism between CRAO of heart and aorta. In both heart and aorta, CRAO was inhibited by semicarbazide, (+)-amphetamine, phenelzine and (+)- and (?)-mexiletine, with the (+)-form being more potent. Straight-chain diamine and polyamine compounds failed to inhibit in concentrations up to 10?4 M. Thus, CRAO is not a typical diamine or polyamine oxidase. The results show differences between heart and aortic CRAO and MAO-A, and the possibility exists for heterogeneity within each of these two distinct forms of amine oxidase. Additionally, drugs known to inhibit MAO-(+)-amphetamine, phenelzine and mexiletine also inhibit CRAO. However, the biological significance of since the physiological role of CRAO is unknown.
Keywords:To whom correspondence should be addressed  
本文献已被 ScienceDirect 等数据库收录!
设为首页 | 免责声明 | 关于勤云 | 加入收藏

Copyright©北京勤云科技发展有限公司  京ICP备09084417号