刺五加注射液与丹参注射液治疗不稳定型心绞痛的比较

目的 :比较刺五加与丹参注射液治疗不稳定型心绞痛的疗效。方法 :78例不稳定型心绞痛病人随机分为刺五加组 38例 (男性 2 1例 ,女性 17例 ,年龄 6 0a±s 10a) ,予刺五加注射液 6 0mL +5%葡萄糖注射液 2 50mL ,静脉滴注 (静滴 ) ,qd× 10d。丹参组 4 0例 (男性 2 4例 ,女性 16例 ,年龄 59a± 8a)予丹参注射液 2 0mL +5%葡萄糖注射液 2 50mL ,静滴 ,qd× 10d。结果 :治疗组及对照组临床症状总有效率分别为 97%及 85% ,经Ridit分析 ,差别有显著意义 (P <0 .0 5) ;2组心电图总有效率分别为89 %及 6 0 % ,经Ridit分析 ,差别有显著意义(P <0 .0 5)。结论 :刺五加注射液治疗不稳定型心绞痛疗效优于丹参注射液。

Acanthopanax senticosus vs Salvia miltiorrhiza injection in treating unstable angina

AIM: To compare the efficacy of injections of Acanthopanax senticosus and Salvia mitiorrhiza in treating unstable angina. METHODS: Seventy eight patients with unstable angina were randomly divided into 2 groups. Thirty eight patients (M 21, F 17; age 60 a± s 10 a) received injection of Acanthopanax senticosus 60 mL in 5% glucose injection 250 mL, iv drip, qd for 10 d. The other 40 patients as control group (M 24, F 16; age 59 a±8 a) received injection of Salvia miltiorrhiza compound 20 mL in 5% glucose injection 250 mL, iv drip, qd for 10 d. RESULTS: The total clinical effective rate for 2 groups were 97%, 85%, respectively. Significant difference ( P <0.05) was found between the Acanthopanax senticosus group and the salvia miltiorrhiza group. Total effective rate of electrocardiology for 2 groups were 89%, 60%, respectively, in the Acanthopanax senticosus group are showed that better than the Salvia miltiorrhiza group ( P < 0.01). CONCLUSION: Injection of Acathopanax senticosus is superior to Salvia miltiorrhiza in treating unstable angina pectoris.