社会信息加工-归因偏向问卷中文版在大学生中的应用

目的:在大学生中修订社会信息加工-归因偏向问卷(SIP-ABQ)。方法:对631名大学生(样本1)和600名大学生(样本2)分别进行探索性与验证性因子分析;以Buss-Perry攻击问卷(BPAQ)、替代性攻击问卷(DAQ)和SIP-ABQ负性情绪分量表为构念效度检验问卷;6个月后对样本1中的238人进行重测。结果:对SIP-ABQ归因部分进行探索性因子分析得到敌意归因、工具归因和积极归因3个因子,累计方差总解释率为45.71%;验证性因子分析支持3因子模型,排除工具归因和积极归因的5个条目后的拟合指数良好(χ^2=399.40,df=145,χ^2/df=2.75,CFI=0.92,TLI=0.91,RMSEA=0.05,SRMR=0.06);敌意归因得分与各构念效度得分均呈正相关(ICC=0.29~0.59)。问卷3个因子的Cronbachα系数分别为0.87、0.77、0.63,重测信度(ICC)分别为0.78、0.65、0.71。结论:社会信息加工-归因偏向问卷中文版的敌意归因的效度与信度良好,可以作为大学生敌意归因偏向的评估工具,但应谨慎使用工具归因和积极归因分量表。

Application of the Chinese version of the Social Information Processing-Attribution Bias Questionnaire in college students

Objective:To revise the Social Information Processing-Attribution Bias Questionnaire(SIP-ABQ)among college students.Method:Exploratory factor analysis and confirmatory factor analysis were used for 631 col-lege students(sample 1)and 600 college students(sample 2),respectively.The Buss-Perry Questionnaire(BPAQ),Displaced Aggression Questionnaire(DAQ)and SIP-ABQ negative emotional response were used as construct validity test questionnaires.Results:The exploratory factor analysis extracted 3 component including hostility attribution,instrumental attribution and benign attribution,and the total variance explanation rate was 45.71%.Confirmatory factor analysis showed that the fitting index of the 3-factor model was good(χ^2=399.40,df=145,χ^2/df=2.75,CFI=0.92,TLI=0.91,RMSEA=0.05,SRMR=0.06).The hostility attribution scores were positive correlated with all construct validity test questionnaire scores(ICC=0.29-0.59).The Cronbach's alpha coefficients were 0.87,0.77 and 0.63 for the three factors of CVSIP-ABQ,and the retest reliability coefficients(ICC)were 0.78,0.65 and 0.71.Conclusion:The validity and reliability of the hostility attribution subscale of the CVSIPABQ are good,which could be used as an effective tool to evaluate college students'hostility attribution tendency.However,instrumental attribution and benign attribution subscales should be used with caution.