首页 | 本学科首页   官方微博 | 高级检索  
     

新鲜股骨颈骨折两种手术治疗结果分析
引用本文:夏志锋. 新鲜股骨颈骨折两种手术治疗结果分析[J]. 生物骨科材料与临床研究, 2004, 1(7): 37-38
作者姓名:夏志锋
作者单位:河南南阳市骨科医院
摘    要:目的 总结空心加压钉与Richard钉治疗新鲜股骨颈骨折的愈后结果。方法 分析82例新鲜股骨颈骨折应用两种不同手术不同结果及原因。结果 按马元璋提出的标准评定疗效空心钉组愈后优良率93%、Richard钉组优良率79%。结论 治疗新鲜股骨颈骨折,空心钉内固定比Richard钉内固定更具优势。

关 键 词:股骨颈骨折 空心钉 Richard钉

Analysis of effects of the femoral neck fracture by two kinds of treatment
XIA Zhi-feng,Orthopedic Hospital of Nanyang,HeNan. Analysis of effects of the femoral neck fracture by two kinds of treatment[J]. Orthopaedic Biomechanics Materials and Clinical Study, 2004, 1(7): 37-38
Authors:XIA Zhi-feng  Orthopedic Hospital of Nanyang  HeNan
Affiliation:XIA Zhi-feng,Orthopedic Hospital of Nanyang,HeNan 473000
Abstract:Objective To summarize the effect for treating the fresh fracture of the femoral neck with the Double-heads empty compression screw (DECS) or the Dynamic hipscrew (DHS). Methods Eighty-two cases with fresh fracture of the femoral neck were treated by two different operations. To analyze the different effect and reason. Results After all cases were healed, with Ma Yuan-zhang criterion evaluation, the percentage of successful outcomes was 93% in DECS and 79% in DHS. Conclusion For treating the fresh fracture of the femoral neck, DECS is superior to DHS .
Keywords:Fresh fracture of femoral neck  Double-heads empty compression screw (DECS)  Dynamic hip screw (DHS).
本文献已被 CNKI 维普 等数据库收录!
设为首页 | 免责声明 | 关于勤云 | 加入收藏

Copyright©北京勤云科技发展有限公司  京ICP备09084417号