首页 | 本学科首页   官方微博 | 高级检索  
检索        

双管引流在坏疽穿孔性阑尾炎及阑尾周围脓肿手术中的应用
引用本文:尚现章,章跃民,尹丛,杨杰,张杰.双管引流在坏疽穿孔性阑尾炎及阑尾周围脓肿手术中的应用[J].腹部外科,2009,22(1):35-36.
作者姓名:尚现章  章跃民  尹丛  杨杰  张杰
作者单位:武警广东省总队医院普外科,广州,510507
摘    要:目的比较坏疽、穿孔性阑尾炎及阑尾周围脓肿术后双管引流和非引流的临床疗效。方法选择2006年1月至2008年8月我院收治的坏疽、穿孔性阑尾炎及阑尾周围脓肿80例,随机分为两组:双管引流组38例,非引流组42例;比较两种方法的腹腔脓肿发生情况、伤口感染率和住院时间。结果非引流组发现1例腹腔脓肿,伤口感染率明显较双管引流组高(P〈0.01);非引流组住院时间为(10.3±2.6)d,双管引流组住院时间为(7.2±1.9)d,两组比较差异有统计学意义(P〈0.05)。结论对于坏疽、穿孔性阑尾炎及阑尾周围脓肿,双管引流可以缩短病人住院时间,有效避免腹腔脓肿形成和伤口感染发生。

关 键 词:阑尾炎  引流术  腹部脓肿  外科伤口感染

Application of double-tube drainage in patients with complicated appendicitis
Institution:SHANG Xian-zhang, ZHANG Yue-rnin ,YIN Cong , et al. (Department of General Surgery, Guangdong General Hospital of Chinese People's Armed Police Forces ,Guangzhou 510107,China)
Abstract:Objective To compare the clinical effectiveness of double-tube drainage management vs non-drainage in patients with complicated appendicitis. Methods Hospital records of 80 patients who underwent appendectomy between Jan.2006 and Aug. 2008 were reviewed. Double-tube drainage management was done in 38 patients(double-tube drainage group), and the remaining didn't receive drainage(non-drainage group). Incidence of surgical wound infection(SWI), and abdominal abscess and length of stay (LOS)were compared between two groups. Results Patients with non-drainage had a higher incidence of SWI(P〈0. 01)and longer LOS(10. 3 ± 2. 6) days vs(7. 2 ± 1.9)days,P〈0. 05]. There was one case of abdominal abscess in non-drainage group. Conclusion Abdominal abscess and SWI can be avoided for complicated appendicitis with double-tube drainage management, and LOS was shorter.
Keywords:Appendicitis  Drainage  Abdominal abscess  Surgical wound infection  
本文献已被 CNKI 维普 万方数据 等数据库收录!
设为首页 | 免责声明 | 关于勤云 | 加入收藏

Copyright©北京勤云科技发展有限公司  京ICP备09084417号