首页 | 本学科首页   官方微博 | 高级检索  
检索        

宫颈癌调强放疗和三维适形放疗剂量对比研究
引用本文:张书旭,徐海荣,林生趣,李文华.宫颈癌调强放疗和三维适形放疗剂量对比研究[J].中国医学物理学杂志,2004,21(5):252-254,261.
作者姓名:张书旭  徐海荣  林生趣  李文华
作者单位:1. 广州市肿瘤医院,放疗中心,广东,广州,510095;南方医科大学,医工系,广东,广州,510515
2. 南方医科大学,医工系,广东,广州,510515
3. 广州市肿瘤医院,放疗中心,广东,广州,510095
基金项目:广东省科技厅科技计划,广东省自然科学基金
摘    要:目的:研究宫颈癌调强放疗(IMRT)和三维适形放疗(3D-CRT)时靶区及其周围正常组织受照剂量的差异.材料方法:用拓能公司生产的WiMRT三维适形调强放疗计划系统分别进行6~9个照射角度的3D-CRT和IMRT计划设计,肿瘤量45Gy,计算出正常组织和靶区的剂量—体积直方图以及所需照射的总跳数.用Siemens生产的Primart电子直线加速器(X射线能量6MV,MLC叶片29对)实施放疗计划,测量出10 cm×10cm射野外漏射线和散射线剂量率,估算放疗时正常组织所受辐射剂量随距离的变化关系.结果:照射野数和照射角度一致,IMRT时膀胱、直肠、阴道所受平均剂量分别只有3D-CRT时的19.5%(29.3/150.3)、64.5%(538.0/833.0)和61.0%(1553.6/2546.3),靶区平均受照剂量略高于3D-CRT.IMRT病人正常组织所受散射线和漏射线剂量约为3D-CRT病人的1.5倍.结论:宫颈癌IMRT剂量分布优于3D-CRT.

关 键 词:宫颈肿瘤  放射疗3D-CRT
文章编号:1005-202X(2004)05-0252-03

Dosimetric Analysis and Comparison for Cervical Cancer Patients Receiving 3D-CRT and IMRT
ZHANG Shu-xu,XU Hai-rong,LIN Sheng-qu,LI Wen-hua.Dosimetric Analysis and Comparison for Cervical Cancer Patients Receiving 3D-CRT and IMRT[J].Chinese Journal of Medical Physics,2004,21(5):252-254,261.
Authors:ZHANG Shu-xu    XU Hai-rong  LIN Sheng-qu  LI Wen-hua
Institution:ZHANG Shu-xu1,2,XU Hai-rong2,LIN Sheng-qu1,LI Wen-hua2
Abstract:Objective: To estimate the dosimetric differences for patients with cer vical carcinoma who receive three-dimensional conformal radiotherapy (3D-CRT) an d intensity modulated radiation therapy (IMRT) respectively. Methods: The 3D-CRT and IMRT plans with 6 to 9 beam fields respectively for cervical cancer patient s were created by a commercial WiMRT 3D TPS. The DVH for bladder, rectum, vagina and GTV and the total number of monitor units (MU) of each plan were calculated by the WiMRT 3D-TPS, and the treatment was delivered with 6 MV photons using a "step-and-shoot" technique on a Siemens Primart linac with 29-leaf MLC. The X-ra y leakage and scattered dose (LSD) at the dmax (maximum dose depth) in the water was measured by dosimeter and ion chamber. The irradiation dose to normal tiss ues at a certain distance outside the treatment fields was calculated by using t he LSD and the total MU of each plan. Result: The average dose of bladder, rectu m and vagina of IMRT patients are respectably only 19.5%, 64.5% and 61.0% that o f 3D-CRT patients with the same number of fields and gantry angles, but the dose to GTV of IMRT patients is higher than that of 3D-CRT patients. The LSD for nor mal tissues of patients receiving IMRT is about 1.5 times that of 3D-CRT patient s. Conclusion: IMRT has more advantages than 3D-CRT for patients with cervical c arcinoma.
Keywords:3D-CRT  IMRT
本文献已被 CNKI 万方数据 等数据库收录!
设为首页 | 免责声明 | 关于勤云 | 加入收藏

Copyright©北京勤云科技发展有限公司  京ICP备09084417号