两种网片悬吊术治疗女性压力性尿失禁的疗效比较

目的 评估两种网片悬吊术治疗女性压力性尿失禁的疗效及安全性.方法 将75例女性压力性尿失禁（SUI）患者分成2组,A组（35例）采用童氏前路悬吊术治疗,B组（40例）行改良TVT-O术治疗,分析2组手术疗效、安全性及并发症等.结果 2组术式在手术时间（20.13±4.96）min vs（16.46±7.65）min]、术中出血（39.86±5.48）ml vs（37.23±8.25）ml]、损伤（0 vs 0）、近期尿潴留（1/35 vs 2/40）、治愈率（94.3% vs 92.5%）等方面差异均无统计学意义（P〉0.05）,但A组手术费用低于B组（980.74±212.45）元 vs （2879.06±467.13）元],差异有统计学意义（P〈0.05）.结论 两种术式对SUI的治疗效果相似,改良TVT-O手术难度较大,适合在大型医院内进行推广;童氏前路悬吊术不经盆腔,完全在直视下进行,操作简单、安全、经济,也可在基层医院内进行推广,还可以作为TVT、SPARC、ⅣS、MONARC、TOT、TVT-O等术式失败后的一种补救手术措施.

Comparison of curative effect between two mesh suspensions in treating female stress urinary incontinence

Objective To evaluate the curative effect difference between Tong's anterior mesh suspension and modified tension-free vaginal tape-obturator (TVT-O). Methods 75 SUI cases were random divided into two groups: Group A (35 cases) were accepted Tong's anterior mesh suspension and group B (40cases) were accepted modified tension-free vaginal tape- obturator. Curative effects, operation safety,and complications and so on, were recorded and compared. Results There had no statistical differences between these two groups on operation time, bleeding lose, operation injury, immediate postoperative urinary retention andcure rates, but the operation expense of group A was cheaper than group B (980. 74 ±212.45)yuan vs (2879.06 ±467. 13)yuan , P ＜0.05). Conclusion The curative effect between two methods were similar. It's a little complicated and fit to be popularized in large hospital to modified tensionfree vaginal tape-obturator. Tong's anterior mesh suspension was performed under completely direct vision,not through pelvic cavity, and it was an economic, convenient and easy way, which not only fit to be popularized in basic hospital, but also a surgical remedial measure to the failures who accepted these operations,such as TVT, SPARC, IVS, MONARC, TOT, TVT-O, etc.