儿童乘车风险行为诊断量表的汉化及信效度检验

目的 翻译并汉化适合我国0～6岁儿童家长的儿童乘车风险行为诊断量表(CRRBDS),并检验其信度和效度。方法 获取量表原作者授权后,采用Brislin翻译模式对英文版儿童乘车风险行为诊断量表进行翻译、回译、文化调试,形成中文版CRRBDS;利用中文版CRRBDS对青岛市某三甲医院儿童保健科的儿童父母、青岛市某幼儿园的幼儿家长进行调查,以评价量表的信效度。结果 中文版CRRBDS包含类型选择认知、反应效能、自我效能、感知严重性、感知易感性5个维度,共16个条目,累积方差贡献率为72.939%;各项目得分与总分的相关系数为0.550～0.697;中文版CRRBDS条目水平的内容效度指数(I-CVI)为0.800～1.000,量表水平的内容效度指数(S-CVI)为0.950;量表总体的Cronbach's α系数为0.886,折半信度为0.931,重测信度为0.862。结论 中文版CRRBDS具有较好的信效度,可以用于测量父母对儿童乘车风险行为的诊断。

Reliability and validity test of Chinese version of the Child Riding Risk Behavior Diagnostic Scale

Objective To translate and revise Child Riding Risk Behavior Diagnostic Scale(CRRBDS), and to evaluate the reliability and validity test of Chinese version of CRRBDS. Methods After obtaining the authorization of the original author of RBDS, the English version of CRRBDS was translated, retranslated and cross-culturally adjusted by using Brislin translation mode to form the Chinese version of CRRBDS. Then the Chinese version of CRRBDS was used to investigate the parents of child healthcare department in a triple A hospital in Qingdao and the parents of children in a kindergarten in Qingdao, so as to evaluate its reliability and validity. Results The CRRBDS contained 16 items divided into 5 dimensions, including type selection cognition, response efficacy, self-efficacy, perceived severity and perceptual susceptibility, with the cumulative variance contribution rate of 72.939%. The correlation coefficient between the scores of each item and the total score ranged from 0.550 to 0.697. The content validity index(I-CVI) of the Chinese version of CRRBDS items ranged from 0.800 to 1.000, and the content validity index(S-CVI) of the scale level was 0.950. The Cronbach's α coefficient of the scale was 0.886, the split-half reliability coefficient was 0.931 and the test-retest reliability coefficient was 0.862. Conclusion The Chinese version of the CRRBDS has good reliability and validity, which can be used to measure parents' diagnosis of children's riding risk behavior.