Results of a four-year multi-channel regional program for monitoring stroke survivors in Franche-Comté, France |
| |
| Institution: | 2. CIC-1431 Inserm Département de Neurologie, CHU Besançon, Besançon, France;3. Télémédecine 360, TLM360, Paris, France;4. RUN-FC, Besançon, France;5. Département de neurologie, CHU Besançon, Besançon, France;1. EA 481 Laboratoire de Neurosciences Intégratives et Cliniques, Université de Franche-Comté, UBFC, Besançon, France;2. CIC-1431 Inserm Département de Neurologie, CHU Besançon, Besançon, France;3. Télémédecine 360, TLM360, Paris, France;4. RUN-FC, Besançon, France;5. Département de neurologie, CHU Besançon, Besançon, France;1. Department of Neurology, University Hospital of Toulouse, 31059 Toulouse cedex 9, France;2. Centre de Ressources et de Compétences Sclérose en plaques, University Hospital of Toulouse, 31059 Toulouse cedex 9, France;3. Inserm UMR1291 - CNRS UMR5051, University Toulouse 3, University Hospital of Toulouse, 31024 Toulouse cedex 3, France;1. Neurology department, Raymond-Poincaré university hospital, AP–HP, Garches, France;2. Nord-Est-Île-de-France neuromuscular reference center, FHU PHENIX, France;3. New Technologies Platform, Raymond-Poincaré hospital, AP–HP, Garches, France;4. U 1179 INSERM, université Versailles–Saint-Quentin-en-Yvelines, Paris-Saclay, France;5. Critical care medical department, Raymond-Poincaré hospital, AP–HP, Garches, France;6. Diagnostic and interventional medical imaging department, Raymond-Poincaré hospital, DMU smart imaging, GH université Paris-Saclay, AP–HP, Garches, France;7. Université Paris-Saclay, UVSQ, ERPHAN, 78000 Versailles, France;8. Physiology department, Raymond-Poincaré university hospital, AP–HP, Garches, France;9. CIC 1429 AP–HP INSERM, université Versailles–Saint-Quentin-en-Yvelines, Paris-Saclay, France |
| |
| Abstract: | IntroductionClinical monitoring of stroke survivors after hospital discharge was initiated in France in 2012 and funding for its model began in 2016. A regional program in Franche-Comté relying on various assessment methods including telehealth was initiated. The objective of this study was to describe the implementation and quality of the program.MethodsA retrospective observational study was conducted from 1st January 2016 to 31st December 2019. Patients were included if they were adults, hospitalized for stroke or transient ischemic attack in one of the six public hospitals in the region and discharged alive. There were five types of monitoring methods: physical consultation, day hospital, nurse-led phone consultation, postal mail or medical record analysis. Characteristics, method of monitoring and discharge delay were described.ResultsIn total, 7166 patients were identified; male gender predominated (52.9%); mean age was 72.2 years. Monitoring coverage increased from 89.2% to 92% within the period. Most patients had ischemic stroke (68.5%, n = 4912) and were at home at the time of monitoring (71.6%, n = 5130). The main method was nurse-led phone consultations (40.8%, n = 2921) followed by physical consultation (16%, n = 1143). Day hospital monitoring increased (1.5% to 14.4%) while the postal mail method decreased (18.7% to 8.1%). The average delay decreased from 240.3 to 148.6 days. Monitoring period of less than four months was 46.2% in 2019 and 75.3% for thrombolysis. In 2019, 99.3% of patients were being monitored at one year. Mortality decreased from 10% to 6.3%.DiscussionThe program improved over time with an increase in the number of patients and reduction in delays and mortality rate. |
| |
| Keywords: | Stroke Follow-up Monitoring Telehealth Telecare |
| 本文献已被 ScienceDirect 等数据库收录！ |
|
