首页 | 本学科首页   官方微博 | 高级检索  
检索        

基于共识法《健康评估》课程思政元素指标体系的构建
引用本文:王宗华,林莉,范姜珊,黄玲芳,刘薇薇,罗羽.基于共识法《健康评估》课程思政元素指标体系的构建[J].中华医学教育探索杂志,2024,23(4):449-454.
作者姓名:王宗华  林莉  范姜珊  黄玲芳  刘薇薇  罗羽
作者单位:陆军军医大学护理系,重庆 400038
基金项目:陆军军医大学课程思政专项研究课题(2022KCSZ-B14);陆军军医大学教学成果立项培育项目(30)
摘    要:目的 构建《健康评估》课程思政元素及思政案例纳入指标体系,为《健康评估》课程思政教学评价提供依据。方法 采用文献分析法、名义群体法和德尔菲专家咨询法,构建护理本科专业《健康评估》课程思政元素及思政案例纳入指标,并应用层次分析法量化条目,确立最终各级指标权重。结果 2轮函询专家积极系数均为100%;专家权威系数为0.880;思政元素体系第2轮变异系数为0.078,肯德尔系数为0.334;思政案例纳入标准第2轮变异系数为0.075,肯德尔系数为0.312。最终形成包括6个一级指标和30个二级指标的《健康评估》课程思政元素体系,以及包括9个指标的《健康评估》课程思政案例纳入指标。结论 护理本科生《健康评估》课程思政元素及案例纳入指标设置合理,具有良好的科学性及可靠性,可为后期构建《健康评估》思政教学体系提供依据。

关 键 词:教育  护理  名义群体法  德尔菲法  健康评估  课程思政
收稿时间:2023/10/9 0:00:00

Construction of an index system of ideological and political education elements of Health Assessment course based on consensus methods
Wang Zonghu,Lin Li,Fan Jiangshan,Huang Lingfang,Liu Weiwei,Luo Yu.Construction of an index system of ideological and political education elements of Health Assessment course based on consensus methods[J].Chinese Journal of Medical Education Research,2024,23(4):449-454.
Authors:Wang Zonghu  Lin Li  Fan Jiangshan  Huang Lingfang  Liu Weiwei  Luo Yu
Institution:Department of Nursing, Army Medical University, Chongqing 400038, China
Abstract:Objective To construct an index system for including ideological and political education elements and cases in the Health Assessment course, and to provide a reference for the evaluation of ideological and political teaching of the Health Assessment course.Methods By using literature analysis, the nominal group method, and the Delphi expert consultation method, we determined indicators for ideological and political elements and case inclusion criteria for the undergraduate nursing course Health Assessment. The analytic hierarchy method was applied to quantify the items and determine the final weights of the indicators at each level.Results The response rates of two rounds of expert consultation were both 100%. The authority coefficient of the experts was 0.880. For the second-round consultation on the system of ideological and political elements, the coefficient of variation was 0.078, and the Kendall''s coefficient of concordance was 0.334. For the second-round consultation on the inclusion criteria for ideological and political cases, the coefficient of variation was 0.075, and the Kendall''s coefficient of concordance was 0.312. Finally, we determined 6 first-level indicators and 30 second-level indicators for the ideological and political elements of the Health Assessment course, and 9 indicators for the inclusion of ideological and political cases for the Health Assessment course.Conclusions The established index system for the ideological and political elements and cases of the Health Assessment course for nursing undergraduates is reasonable, scientific, and reliable, which can provide a reference for subsequent construction of the ideological and political teaching system for the Health Assessment course.
Keywords:Education  Nursing  Nominal group technique  Delphi method  Health assessment  Ideological and political education
点击此处可从《中华医学教育探索杂志》浏览原始摘要信息
点击此处可从《中华医学教育探索杂志》下载免费的PDF全文
设为首页 | 免责声明 | 关于勤云 | 加入收藏

Copyright©北京勤云科技发展有限公司  京ICP备09084417号