MRI检查对半月板桶柄状撕裂的诊断价值研究

目的:探讨MR影像在膝关节半月板桶柄状撕裂(Bucket Handle Tear,BHT)中的诊断价值及MRI诊断BHT的观察方法。方法:采用敏感度、特异度等指标,盲法回顾分析130例同时行MRI及关节镜(Arthroscope,AS)检查治疗的膝关节损伤患者诊断结果,其中以经关节镜诊断BHT76例作为金标准,评价项目包括:①原始报告诊断;②中央移位的半月板碎片;③双后交叉韧带征;④蝶结消失征。结果:原始报告诊断BHT敏感度为43%,特异度为87%。中央移位的半月板碎片敏感度为72%,特异度为87%。双后交叉韧带征敏感度为31%,特异度为97%。蝶结消失征敏感度为71%,特异度为69%。结论:采用MRI诊断BHT时,中央移位的半月板碎片的特异度和敏感度均较高,而蝶结消失征的敏感度高,特异度低,双后交叉韧带征的特异度最高,敏感度最低。

Research of the Value of MR Imaging in Diagnosing the Bucket Handle Tear of the Knee Meniscus

Objective To evaluate the value of MRI in diagnosing the bucket handle tear (BHT) of the knee meniscus.Methods Eighty four knees which underwent both MRI and arthroscopy (AS) examinations were analyzed. Results of AS were used as golden standard to evaluate the results of MRI. The evaluating criteria included primary reports, central displaced fragments of meniscus (CDFM), double posterior cruciate ligament sign (DPCLS) and the absent bow tie sign (ABTS). Results For MRI diagnosing BHT, the sensitivity and specificity of primary reports were 43% and 87%, respectively; the sensitivity and specificity of CDFM were 72% and 87%, respectively; the sensitivity and specificity of the DPCLF were 31% and 97%, respectively; and the sensitivity and specificity of the ABTS were 71% and 69%, respectively.Conclusions When MRI was applied to diagnose BHT, the CDFM had higher sensitivity and specificity, while the ABTS had higher sensitivity and lower specificity. The DPCLF had the highest specificity and the lowest sensitivity.