A comparative study of postoperative adhesion formation after laparoscopic vs open cholecystectomy

BACKGROUND: There is little evidence in the literature to support a lower incidence of adhesion formation following laparoscopic surgery rather than laparotomy. Adhesion formation after laparotomy has been well studied, but we believe that the decrease or absence of adhesions following laparoscopic surgery is underreported. Therefore, we set out to evaluate adhesion formation following laparoscopic cholecystectomy (LC) compared with open cholecystectomy (OC). METHODS: Group A consisted of 18 patients who underwent a second laparoscopy due to various intraabdominal diseases after an LC had already been performed. Group B consisted of eight patients who underwent laparoscopy due to various intraabdominal diseases after an open cholecystectomy performed at an earlier date. In both groups, the frequency, extent, and thickness of adhesions were evaluated according to a standardized scoring system. RESULTS: Ten patients in group A (55.5%) had no adhesion formation either on the treated side of the previous LC or on the trocar entry sites. Three patients (16.6%) had minimal adhesions on the treated side of the previous LC, but no adhesions were observed at the trocar entry sites. Five patients (27.7%) had loose, easily separable adhesions on the treated site of the previous LC and at the trocar entry sites. All eight patients in group B (100%) had thick and extensive adhesions either on the treated side of the previous open cholecystectomy or the anterior abdominal wall below the surgical incision. CONCLUSION: This comparative clinical study suggests that LC results in less adhesion formation, either on the operative or at the trocar entry sites, than open cholecystectomy.