Visual changes after transnasal endoscopic versus transcaruncular medial orbital wall decompression for dysthyroid optic neuropathy

ObjectiveTo compare postoperative changes in visual acuity between the transnasal endoscopic approach and the transcaruncular approach when comparison of preoperative values used for medial orbital wall decompression in patients with dysthyroid optic neuropathy.MethodsWe included 14 patients (23 sides) and divided them into a transnasal group (11 sides, 8 patients) and a transcaruncular group (12 sides, 6 patients). Visual acuity was examined preoperatively, on postoperative days 1, 3, and 7, and at a final follow-up visit. The differences in postoperative improvement of the logarithm of the minimum angle of resolution (logMAR) visual acuity and critical flicker frequency (CFF) between the two surgical groups at each time point were analyzed using the Mann–Whitney U test.ResultsPostoperative improvement in logMAR visual acuity on postoperative days 1 and 3 and that in CFF on postoperative day 1 were greater in the endonasal group than in the transcaruncular group (P < 0.050). Vision was improved or maintained in all patients in the transnasal group at the final follow-up. One patient in the transcaruncular group had loss of vision on one side and decreased vision on the other side after surgery.ConclusionMedial orbital decompression appears to provide better postoperative vision when performed by the transnasal approach than by the transcaruncular approach in patients with dysthyroid optic neuropathy.