首页 | 本学科首页   官方微博 | 高级检索  
检索        


The impact of frailty in critically ill patients after trauma: A prospective observational study
Institution:1. Department of Intensive Care, Austin Hospital, Melbourne, Victoria, Australia;2. Department of Anaesthesiology and Intensive Care, Catholic University of Sacred Hearth, “A. Gemelli” University Hospital, Rome, Italy;3. Australian and New Zealand Intensive Care Research Centre, Monash University School of Public Health and Preventive Medicine, Alfred Hospital, Melbourne, Victoria, Australia;1. Department of Intensive Care Medicine, Hospital Universitario de Guadalajara, Spain;2. Department of Intensive Care Medicine, Hospital Universitario de La Paz, Spain;3. Department of Intensive Care Medicine, Hospital Universitario Clínica Puerta de Hierro-Majadahonda, Spain;4. Department of Epidemiology, University Jaume I of Castellón, Spain
Abstract:BackgroundAs our population ages, older adults are increasingly exposed to trauma. Frailty could be a useful measure to identify patients at risk of a poor outcome. This study aimed to determine the impact of frailty in an Australian trauma intensive care unit (ICU) population.MethodsA prospective observational study of critically ill trauma patients ≥50 years of age. Frailty was determined on admission to the ICU using the frailty phenotype. Demographic and hospital data were collected, and patients were followed up at 6 and 12 months. The primary outcome was 12-month mortality, and multiple regression was used to determine associated factors.ResultsOne hundred thirty-eight patients were included, whose mean age was 68 years; 78.2% (108/138) were classified as major trauma (Injury Severity Score >12). Twenty-two percent (30/138) of patients were identified as frail. Patients with frailty were significantly older: however, they were less severely injured and required lower rates of surgical interventions and mechanical ventilation. Frailty was independently associated with mortality at 6 and 12 months (odds ratio: 5.9, 95% confidence interval: 1.9–18.1 and odds ratio: 7.3, 95% confidence interval: 2.5–21.9, respectively). Patients with frailty had lower measures of global functioning (Glasgow Outcome Scale-Extended frail 3 1–5] vs nonfrail 6 (5–7], p = 0.002) and health status (Euro Qol 5Q-5D-5L utility score 0.6 0.5–0.7] vs 0.7 0.6–0.9], p = 0.02) at 12 months than patients without frailty.ConclusionFrailty is a useful predictor of poor outcomes in critically ill trauma patients.Registration of protocol numberACTRN12615000039583.
Keywords:Intensive care unit  Critical illness  Frailty  Trauma
本文献已被 ScienceDirect 等数据库收录!
设为首页 | 免责声明 | 关于勤云 | 加入收藏

Copyright©北京勤云科技发展有限公司  京ICP备09084417号