Surgical safety checklist: implementation in an ambulatory surgical facility |
| |
Authors: | Pamela J. Morgan MD Lisa Cunningham BA Sohini Mitra BSc Natalie Wong BHSc Wei Wu MSc Victoria Noguera RN Mary Li MSc John Semple MD |
| |
Affiliation: | 1. Department of Anesthesia, Women’s College Hospital, University of Toronto, 76 Grenville St., Toronto, ON, M5S 1B2, Canada 2. Women’s College Research Institute, University of Toronto, Toronto, ON, Canada 3. Department of Nursing, Women’s College Hospital, University of Toronto, Toronto, ON, Canada 4. Department of Surgery, Women’s College Hospital, University of Toronto, Toronto, ON, Canada
|
| |
Abstract: | Purpose In 2007, the World Health Organization created a Surgical Safety Checklist (SSC) that encompassed a simple set of surgical safety standards. The threefold purpose of this study was to add ambulatory-specific items to the SSC, to introduce the items into an ambulatory surgical facility, and to determine if patient outcomes regarding postoperative pain and nausea/vomiting improved following implementation. In addition, safety attitudes, antibiotic timing, regional anesthesia/nerve blocks, preemptive pain medications, prophylactic antiemetics, length of stay, and hospital admission were also assessed. Methods After Research Ethics Board approval, staff complete a Safety Attitudes Questionnaire. Seven items were added to the SSC. Data were then collected on 180 surgical cases before SSC implementation and 195 cases following implementation. Compliance with each section of the SSC was assessed. Results On postoperative day one, the median (97.5% confidence interval [CI]) difference between pre- and post-implementation pain scores was 0.5 (97.5% CI, 0 to 1; P = 0.13), and the median difference in the rate of post-discharge nausea/vomiting was ?8.4% (97.5% CI, ?17.9 to 1.1; P = 0.06). There was no improvement in safety attitudes or any of the secondary outcomes, with the exception of the use of preemptive pain medications. Compliance with the three sections of the checklist, i.e., BRIEFING, TIME OUT, and DEBRIEFING was 99.49%, 97.95%, and 96.92%, respectively. There was low compliance in verbalization of the added “ambulatory-specific items”. Conclusion Potential reasons for lack of uptake and integration include poor “user” buy-in, an overly lengthy checklist, and lack of prioritization of ambulatory-specific items. A shortened SSC was developed based on the results of this study. This trial was registered at ClinicalTrials.gov ID: NCT00934310. |
| |
Keywords: | |
本文献已被 SpringerLink 等数据库收录! |
|