Variation in use of neoadjuvant chemotherapy in patients with stage III breast cancer: Results of the Dutch national breast cancer audit |
| |
Affiliation: | 1. Department of Surgery, Leiden University Medical Centre, Leiden, The Netherlands;2. Department of Research, Comprehensive Cancer Centre the Netherlands (IKNL), Utrecht, The Netherlands;3. Department of Health Technology and Services Research, MIRA Institute for Biomedical Science and Technical Medicine, University of Twente, Enschede, The Netherlands;4. Department of Surgery, Antoni van Leeuwenhoek, Amsterdam, The Netherlands;5. Department of Medical Oncology, Antoni van Leeuwenhoek, Amsterdam, The Netherlands;1. Department of Surgery and Science, Graduate School of Medical Sciences, Kyushu University, Fukuoka, Japan;2. Department of Molecular Oncology, Graduate School of Medical Sciences, Kyushu University, Fukuoka, Japan;3. Department of Anatomic Pathology, Pathological Sciences, Graduate School of Medical Sciences, Kyushu University, Fukuoka, Japan;4. Department of Breast Oncology, National Hospital Organization Kyushu Cancer Center, Fukuoka, Japan;1. Breast Center Düsseldorf Luisenkrankenhaus, Director: Dr.Mahdi Rezai, Hans-Günther-Sohl-Str.6-10, 40235 Düsseldorf, Germany;2. University Hospital of Essen, Department of Gynecology and Obstetrics, West German Cancer Center, Hufelandstr.55, D-45147 Essen, Germany;3. Institute for Medical Informatics, Biometry and Epidemiology (IMIBE), Zweigertstr. 37, D-45130 Essen, Germany;1. Division of Radiation Oncology, The University of Texas MD Anderson Cancer Center, Houston, Texas;2. Department of Diagnostic Radiology, The University of Texas MD Anderson Cancer Center, Houston, Texas;3. Department of Biostatistics, The University of Texas MD Anderson Cancer Center, Houston, Texas;4. Department of Surgical Oncology, The University of Texas MD Anderson Cancer Center, Houston, Texas;6. Department of Breast Medical Oncology, The University of Texas MD Anderson Cancer Center, Houston, Texas;5. Department of Pathology, The University of Texas MD Anderson Cancer Center, Houston, Texas;1. Department of Oncology and Pathology, Karolinska Institute and University Hospital, Stockholm, Sweden;2. Department of Bioscience and Nutrition, Karolinska Institute and University Hospital, Stockholm, Sweden;1. Division of Hematology, Oncology and Blood and Marrow Transplantation, Department of Internal Medicine, Carver College of Medicine, University of Iowa, Iowa City, IA, USA;2. Department of Surgery, Carver College of Medicine, University of Iowa, Iowa City, IA, USA;3. Department of Epidemiology, College of Public Health, University of Iowa, Iowa City, IA, USA;4. Carver College of Medicine, University of Iowa, Iowa City, IA, USA;5. Division of Health Services Research, Department of Pharmacy Practice and Science, College of Pharmacy, University of Iowa, Iowa City, IA, USA;1. Laser Physics Applications Section, Raja Ramanna Centre for Advanced Technology, Indore-452013, India;2. Homi Bhabha National Institute, Raja Ramanna Centre for Advanced Technology, Indore-452013, India;3. UGC-DAE Consortium for Scientific Research, Indore-452010, India;4. Laser Material Processing Division, Raja Ramanna Centre for Advanced Technology, Indore-452013, India;5. Laser System Engineering Division, Raja Ramanna Centre for Advanced Technology, Indore-452013, India |
| |
Abstract: | ObjectivesNeoadjuvant chemotherapy (NAC) is important in the optimal treatment of patients with locally advanced (stage III) breast cancer (BC). The objective of this study was to examine the clinical practice of NAC for stage III BC patients in all Dutch hospitals participating in BC care.Materials and methodsAll patients aged 18–70 years who received surgery for stage III BC from January 2011 to September 2015 were selected from the national multidisciplinary NABON Breast Cancer Audit. Multivariable logistic regression was used to assess independent predictors of NAC use, focussing on hospital factors.ResultsA total of 1230 out of 1556 patients with stage III BC (79%) received NAC prior to surgery. The use of NAC did not change over time. We observed a large variation of NAC use between hospitals (0–100%). Age <50 years, breast MRI, large tumour size, advanced nodal disease, negative hormone receptor status and hospital participation in neoadjuvant clinical studies were significant independent predictors of NAC use (all P < 0.001). NAC use in stage III BC was not influenced by hospital type and hospital surgical volume. After adjustment for all independent predictors, variation in NAC use between hospitals remained (0% to 97%).ConclusionNAC was used in 79% of patients with stage III BC, which represent a high quality of care in the NL. Patient, tumour, clinical management and hospital factors could not explain considerable variation in its use between hospitals. Hospital participation in neoadjuvant studies did show to improve the use of NAC in daily practice. |
| |
Keywords: | Breast cancer Surgery Neoadjuvant chemotherapy Neoadjuvant therapy Guideline compliance Cancer registry Quality of care Study participation Clinical auditing |
本文献已被 ScienceDirect 等数据库收录! |
|