首页 | 本学科首页   官方微博 | 高级检索  
     


Decreased emotion recognition and reduced focus on facial hallmarks in behavioral variant frontotemporal dementia compared to primary psychiatric disorders and controls
Authors:Jay L. P. Fieldhouse  Ellen H. Singleton  Marie-Paule E. van Engelen  Jochum J. van't Hooft  Sterre C. M. de Boer  Violet E. Froeling  Michelle Braun  Mardien L. Oudega  Daniël van Grootheest  Cora Kerssens  Flora H. Duits  Argonde C. van Harten  Everard G. B. Vijverberg  Yolande A. L. Pijnenburg
Affiliation:1. Alzheimer Center Amsterdam, Neurology, Vrije Universiteit Amsterdam, Amsterdam UMC location VUmc, Amsterdam, The Netherlands;2. Alzheimer Center Amsterdam, Neurology, Vrije Universiteit Amsterdam, Amsterdam UMC location VUmc, Amsterdam, The Netherlands

Amsterdam Neuroscience, Neurodegeneration, Amsterdam, The Netherlands;3. Amsterdam UMC location Vrije Universiteit Amsterdam, Department of Psychiatry, Amsterdam, The Netherlands

Amsterdam Neuroscience, Mood, Anxiety, Psychosis, Sleep and Stress program, Amsterdam, The Netherlands

GGZ inGeest Mental Health Care, Amsterdam, The Netherlands

Abstract:

Background and purpose

Early diagnosis of behavioral variant frontotemporal dementia (bvFTD) is challenging due to symptomatic overlap with primary psychiatric disorders (PPD). As emotion recognition deficits are early and key features of bvFTD, the aim was to explore processes driving social cognition deficits that may aid in the differentiation between bvFTD and PPD.

Methods

The total sample (N = 51) included 18 patients with bvFTD, 11 patients with PPD (mood, autism spectrum and psychotic disorders) and 22 controls from the Alzheimer Center Amsterdam of the Amsterdam UMC. Emotion recognition was assessed with the Ekman 60 Faces test, during which eye tracking metrics were collected in the first 5 s a face was presented. Group differences in dwell time on the total image as well as the circumscribed eyes area and mouth area were analysed using ANOVA, with post hoc comparisons.

Results

Patients with bvFTD scored lowest, patients with PPD scored intermediate and controls scored highest on emotion recognition. During facial processing, patients with bvFTD spent less dwell time on the total image than controls (mean difference 11.3%, F(2, 48) = 6.095, p = 0.004; bvFTD−controls p = 0.001, 95% confidence interval [CI] −892.64, −239.70). Dwell time on the eyes area did not differ between diagnostic groups, whilst patients with bvFTD spent less dwell time on the mouth area than PPD patients (mean difference 10.7%; F(2, 48) = 3.423, p = 0.041; bvFTD−PPD p = 0.022, 95% CI −986.38, −79.47) and controls (mean difference 7.8%; bvFTD−controls p = 0.043, 95% CI −765.91, −12.76).

Conclusions

In bvFTD, decreased emotion recognition may be related to reduced focus on facial hallmarks. These findings suggest a valuable role for biometrics in social cognition assessment and the differentiation between bvFTD and PPD.
Keywords:behavior  biometrics  eye tracking  face perception  social cognition
设为首页 | 免责声明 | 关于勤云 | 加入收藏

Copyright©北京勤云科技发展有限公司  京ICP备09084417号