Affiliation: | 1. College of Optometry, The Ohio State University, Columbus, Ohio, USA Contribution: Conceptualization (equal), Formal analysis (supporting), Methodology (equal), Visualization (equal), Writing - original draft (equal), Writing - review & editing (equal);2. College of Optometry, The Ohio State University, Columbus, Ohio, USA Contribution: Conceptualization (equal), Formal analysis (supporting), Investigation (lead), Methodology (equal), Writing - review & editing (equal);3. College of Optometry, The Ohio State University, Columbus, Ohio, USA;4. Department of Mathematical Sciences, Claremont McKenna College, Claremont, California, USA;5. College of Optometry, The Ohio State University, Columbus, Ohio, USA Contribution: Investigation (equal), Writing - review & editing (supporting);6. College of Optometry, The Ohio State University, Columbus, Ohio, USA Contribution: Conceptualization (equal), Funding acquisition (equal), Methodology (equal), Writing - review & editing (supporting) |
Abstract: | Purpose Recent evidence suggests that the ciliary muscle apical fibres are most responsive to accommodative load; however, the structure of the ciliary muscle in individuals with accommodative insufficiency is unknown. This study examined ciliary muscle structure in individuals with accommodative insufficiency (AI). We also determined the response of the ciliary muscle to accommodative/vergence therapy and increasing accommodative demands to investigate the muscle's responsiveness to workload. Methods Subjects with AI were enrolled and matched by age and refractive error with subjects enrolled in another ciliary muscle study as controls. Anterior segment optical coherence tomography was used to measure the ciliary muscle thickness (CMT) at rest (0D), maximum thickness (CMTMAX) and over the area from 0.75 mm (CMT0.75) to 3 mm (CMT3) posterior to the scleral spur of the right eye. For those with AI, the ciliary muscle was also measured at increasing levels of accommodative demand (2D, 4D and 6D), both before and after accommodative/vergence therapy. Results Sixteen subjects with AI (mean age = 17.4 years, SD = 8.0) were matched with 48 controls (mean age = 17.8 years, SD = 8.2). On average, the controls had 52–72 μm thicker ciliary muscles in the apical region at 0D than those with AI (p = 0.03 for both CMTMAX and CMT 0.75). Differences in thickness between the groups in other regions of the muscle were not statistically significant. After 8 weeks of accommodative/vergence therapy, the CMT increased by an average of 22–42 μm (p ≤ 0.04 for all), while AA increased by 7D (p < 0.001). Conclusions This study demonstrated significantly thinner apical ciliary muscle thickness in those with AI and that the ciliary muscle can thicken in response to increased workload. This may explain the mechanism for improvement in signs and symptoms with accommodative/vergence therapy. |