首页 | 本学科首页   官方微博 | 高级检索  
     


A comparison of pre treatment regimens for minimizing the haemodynamic response to blind nasotracheal intubation
Authors:Michele L. Hartigan  Jeanette L. Cleary  Jeffrey B. Gross  David W. Schaffer
Affiliation:1. Departments of Anesthesia, Nazareth Hospital, University of Pennsylvania, and Philadelphia Veterans Administration Medical Center, University and Woodland Avenues, 19104, Philadelphia, PA, USA
Abstract:The authors determined the cardiovascular effects of blind nasotracheal intubation in four randomized groups of 25 patients each, After induction of anaesthesia with IV thiopentone 4 mg-kg-1, patients in group A received no pretreatment, while patients in group B received IV iidocaine 1.5 mg-kg-1. Three minutes before induction, patients in group C received 0 25 per cent phenylephrine nasal spray (0.2 mg in each nostril); those in group D received ten per cent Iidocaine nasal spray (30 mg in each nostril). After intubation, mean arterial pressures (MAP) were highest in group B (IV Iidocaine) patients (p < 0.05), remaining significantly elevated for 5 min. Conversely, within four minutes after intubation, MAP of group D (ten per cent nasal Iidocaine spray) patients were below control (p < 0.05), and lower than those of any other group (p < 0.05). MAP of group A and C patients increased after intubation, but not as much as in group B patients (p < 0.05). There were no adverse effects from the lidocaine nasal spray. Ten per cent lidocaine nasal spray is a safe and effective way to minimize the MAP increases which typically accompany blind nasotracheal intubation in lightly anaesthetized patients.
Keywords:
本文献已被 SpringerLink 等数据库收录!
设为首页 | 免责声明 | 关于勤云 | 加入收藏

Copyright©北京勤云科技发展有限公司  京ICP备09084417号